Science Benchmark Clarification, Instruction, and Assessment


Introduction

MI CliMB expands upon the meaning of each benchmark contained in the Michigan Curriculum Framework, or in the case of Science, the 2000 summer revisions document. The benchmark language is followed by a clarification written by science educators as to what that benchmark means in language that should be understandable to most educators. To further explain the clarification of the benchmark, two additional sections are contained within this document. An instructional example is given along with resources and links to the constructing and reflecting benchmarks used to help facilitate that instruction. Finally, an assessment example and a grading tool are also provided.

It is important to understand that the instructional examples, as well as the assessment examples, do not necessarily contain all the aspects of the benchmark and frequently only a portion of the benchmark is the focus of the instruction and/or assessment. Also, some of the assessments are based on the preceding instructional example and others go back to focus on another aspect of the benchmark.

Remember, this document is not a K-12 curriculum guide. It is an attempt to increase the understanding of the Michigan Science Standards and Benchmarks in order to help support locally-adopted curriculum development and implementation.

This document is a result of a wonderful team of science educators from across the state of Michigan. Fifty-two educators broke into nine teams to focus on the content and skill strands of life, physical and earth at elementary, middle and high school. This team met 16 days altogether between March 2000 and May 2001 to draft and refine their work. They consulted numerous resources and used the Teaching and Learning Standards as well as the Assessment Standards from the Michigan Curriculum Framework to guide their development efforts.

The field review process was extensive. Nineteen Math/Science Centers representing all regions of the state facilitated the field review process. They involved 96 building-level teams in evaluating the clarity and usability of the document. Each review team returned a consensus report with comments to the writing team. The writing teams used the feedback in the Spring 2001 editing sessions.

The science team involved in this project has many people to thank and the list of acknowledgments is attached. Thanks to you who gave your their time, energy and most importantly your expertise to make this document available to science educators across the state.


Science Acknowledgements


Project Directors

Claudia Douglass
Central Michigan University
Doug Hansen
Saginaw Valley State University
Dave Kazen
Consultant
Barbara Kozara
Midland County ESA
Alicia Kubacki
Saginaw ISD
Sue May
Saginaw Twp Community Schools
Dave McCloy
SVSU Regional Math/Science Center
Walt Rathkamp
SVSU Regional Math/Science Center

Management Team

Mary Ellen Bluem
Bay-Arenac ISD
Theron Blakeslee
Dept. of Education
Betty Burke-Coduti
Marquette-Alger ISD
Robert DeBoer
Caro Community Schools
Rodger Epp
Michigan Dept. of Treasury
Denis Fitzgerald
Hale Area Schools
Deb Homeier
North Woods Math/Science Center
Bart Jenniches
Ortonville-Brandon School District
Richard Lane
Saginaw ISD
Mozell Lang
Dept. of Education
Londia Langston
Buena Vista Schools
Dennis Lundgren & Judy Foss
Math/Sci Ctr., Berrien County ISD
Sam Maisano
School Dist. of the City of Saginaw
Gary Money
Grand Traverse Reg.Math/Sci Ctr.
Jim O’Farrell
Iosco RESA
Gerard Putz & Marilyn Bacyinski,
MISD Math/Science Center
Mary Ann Sheline
Math/Science Ctr., GVSU
Joy Beth Siddall
Moran Township School District
Jim Swarts
Grand Rapids Public Schools

Writers and Editors

Tom Abramson
North Woods Math/Science Center
Donna Bergeon
Jenison Public Schools
Charlotte Bollinger
Oscoda Area Schools
Jay Brand
Carney Nadeau K-12 Schools
Joe Bruessow
Bay City Public Schools
Ann Cardon
Muskegon Public Schools
Rebecca Caverly
Buena Vista School District
Andrew Christ
School Dist. of the City of Saginaw
Margaret Comfort
Bellaire Public Schools
David Craymer
Muskegon Public Schools
Linda Custer
Greenville Public Schools
Diane Dalton
Kalkaska Public Schools
Sue DeWitt
Alpena Public Schools
Rockne Finley
Tri County Area Schools
Antoine Gosioco
Detroit Public Schools
Suzanne Guttowsky
Lapeer Community Schools
Michael Thomas Hammer
North Central Area Schools
Kaye Hemerline
Merrill Community Schools
Kathy Hyde
Bentley Community Schools
Greg Hyde
Ortonville-Brandon School District
Brian Johnson
Bay City Public Schools
Rebecca Josephson-Gorinac
Sanilac County Sci/Math Center
Dolores Keeley
Forest Hills
Kristin Kiebler-Green
Western School District
Jamie Klausing
Howell Public Schools
Dianne Kokot
Jenison Public Schools
Kathy Kuipers
Otsego Public Schools
Anna Lount
Fitzgerald Public Schools
Jeannette MacDonald
Allen Park Public Schools
Carolyn Northey
Marquette Public Schools
Barbara Nusbaum
Sturgis Public Schools
Kimberly Anne Palmer
South Lyon Community Schools
Janet Rahl
Freeland Community School District
Louise Rathkamp
Pinconning Area Schools
Steve Rierson
Hopkins Public Schools
Isabell Sand
Plymouth-Canton Community Schools
Ellen Schiller
Muskegon Public Schools
Michelle Seppanen
L’Anse Area Schools
David Smith
Battle Creek School District
Diane Spence
Belleville-Van Buren Public Schools
Mike Squint
Niles Community Schools
Nadine Tibbs-Stallworth
Detroit Public Schools
Ann Marie Strozynski
Hamtramak School District
Paula Stuart
Swan Valley School District
Robert Tallman
Mayville Community Schools
Kathleen Teunis
Wyoming Public Schools
Christina Dillard-Tillman
Science Educator
Arthur Vlahon
New Lothrop Area Public Schools
Art Weinle
Grosse Pointe Public Schools
Jane McCraight-Wertz
Belleville-Van Buren Public Schools
Adrienne West
Black River Charter School
Carol Zuvers
Muskegon Heights Public Schools

Math/Science Center Field Review Facilitators

Johanna Brown
Genesee Area M/S/T Center
David Bydlowski
Wayne County M/S Center
Dave DeGraaf
SMTC Central Michigan Univ.
Jan Farmer
COOR S/M Satellite
Judy Foss
Berrien County M/S Center
Rebecca Josephson-Gorinac
Sanilac County S/M Center
Antione Gosioco
Detroit Public Schools
Tom Green
Hillsdale-Lenawee-Monroe M/S Center
Katy Duggan-Haas
Jackson County M/S Center
Deb Homeier & Tom Abramson
Northwoods M/S Center
Ron Leveille
Eastern UP M/S Center
Dave McCloy
SVSU Regional M/S Center
Pete McCreedy
Lapeer County M/S Center
LaMoine Motz
Oakland Schools S/M/T Center
Jim O’Farrell
AMA-Iosco M/S Center
Amy Oliver
Allegan Count Area M/S Center
Tanya Overweg
Battle Creek M/S Center
Mary Ann Sheline
GVSU Regionl M/S Center
Nadine Tibbs-Stallworth
Detroit Public Schools
Scott Whipple
Huron M/S/T Center

MEAP Science Content Advisory Committee Reviewers

Jennifer Allen
Dowagiac Union Schools
Murney Bell
Anchor Bay School district
Kim Bondy
Charter Academy
Beverly Brown
Livonia Public Schools
Barbara Buczynski
Lamphere Schools
Bruce Ellis
Sturgis Public Schools
Fay Gifford
Lawrence Tech University
Rita Hrecz
Northern Michigan University
Dianne Kokot
Jenison Public Schools
Mary McKinney
Marquette Public Schools
Lorrie McMahon
Ionia Schools
Sandra Moussiaux
Wayne State University
Carolyn Northey
Marquette Public Schools
Marilyn Rands
Lawrence Tech University
Geraldine Stosick
Van Buren Public Schools
Juliana Texley
Anchor Bay School District
Don Tippin
Stockbridge Schools

MEAP Range Finding Committee Reviewers

Mitzi Castelli
Livonia Public Schools
Gretchen Connors
Sandusky Community Schools
Diana DeSilva
Flint Community Schools
Doug Goulette
Gerrish-Higgins Schools
Kristi Hanby
Caro Community Schools
Jody Harris
Livonia Public Schools
Tom Kelly
Grandview Schools
Alice Lott
Detroit Schools
Julie Roberts
Napoleon Community Schools
Catherine Tilles
Detroit Public Schools
Lisa Weise
Holt Public Schools

MSTA Member Reviewers

Rachel Badanowski
Southfield Public Schools
Linda Beebe-Brown
Detroit Public Schools
Donna Bozung
Cedar Springs Public Schools
Bean Burr
Flint Community Schools
John Clark
Ithaca Public Schools
Barbara Deslich
Lansing School District
Sally DeRoo
Wayne State and Oakland Univ.
Cris Dewolf
Chippewa Hills High School
Lois Foster
Hillsdale Community Schools
Donna Gauthier
Mount Clemens Schools
Mary Graham
Ithaca Public Schools
Jean Green
Monroe Public Schools
Darlene Grunert
Birmingham Public Schools
Bob Halgren
Eau Claire Public Schools
Adriann Hulst
Dutton Christian School
Sharon Krueger
Buchanan Comm. Schools
Debra Ligeski
Imlay City Comm. Schools
David Lyons
Troy Public Schools
Joyce Janes
Tri County Schools
Beverly Juip
Durand Area Schools
Ellen Karel
Byron Center Schools
Robin McKenna
Corunna Public Schools
Marya Metes
Archdiocese of Detroit
Francene Moore
Muskegon Heights
Barbara Nuereither
Holt Public Schools
Lou Pressel
Mt. Clemens Schools
Amy Rilley
West Ottawa Public Schools
Dawn Rollenhagen
Battle Creek Public Schools
Kari Selleck
Corunna Public Schools
Michelle Smith
Mt. Clemens Public Schools
Pete Spencer
St. Clair County ISD
Cindy Springer
Durand Area Schools
Debbie Wilson
Grand Blanc Community Schools

Project Evaluator

Project Editor

Trade Book Resources

Dave Kazen
Consultant
Rebecca Chown
Magaret P. Comfort
White Pine Associates
Keith Distributors

Michigan Assessment Team Field Reviewers

Betsy Davis
University of Michigan
Bruce Ellis
Sturgis Public Schools
Julie Fick
Capital Area Science/Math Center
Shamarion Green
Flint Community Schools
Earl Hagstrom
Carman-Ainsworth
Carol Jones
Macomb ISD
Louise Kirks
Consultant
Mozell Lang
Dept. of Education
Stephen McClosky
Marcellus Community Schools
James Mikuska
Consultant
Liz & Paul Niehaus
Niehaus & Associates
Chuck Pearson
Kalamazoo Public Schools
Paul Serri
Livonia Public Schools
Cathy Tilles
Detroit Public Schools
Carla Williams
Detroit Public Schools
Lynda Wood
Southfield Public Schools

School Bulding Field Review Teams

Alpena Public Schools:
Besser Elementary
Thunder Bay Junior High
Alpena High School
Battle Creek School District:
WK Kellogg Middle School
Bay City Public Schools:
TL Handy Middle School
Central High School
Western High School
Bellville-Van Buren Public Schools: Tyler Elementary Benton Harbor Area Schools:
Fair Plain Elementary
Blissfield Community Schools:
Blissfield Middle School
Bullock Creek School District:
Bullock Creek Elementary
Bullock Creek Middle School
Caro Community Schools:
Caro Middle School
Caro High School
Cassopolis Public Schools:
Sam Adams Elementary
Cedarville Les Cheneaux Schools:
Les Cheneaux Middle School
Clinton Community Schools:
Clinton Elementary
Clinton Middle School
Concord Community Schools:
Concord Middle School
Crawford AuSable Schools:
Grayling Middle School
Croswell-Lexington:
Croswell-Lexington Middle School
Croswell-Lexington High School
Detroit Public Elementary Schools:
Bennett, Chandler, Clinton , Cooper, Dow, Higgins, McCollough, Stark Peter Vetal, and Van Zile
Detroit Public Middle Schools:
Brooks, Clippert, Durfee, Hally, Taft, Webber
Detroit Public High Schools:
Boykins, Crockett, Cass Tech, Detroit City, Golightly Educational Ctr, Mumford, Murray-Wright, Northwestern
East Jackson Community Schools:
East Jackson High School
Escanaba Area Schools:
Wells Elementary
Escanaba Middle School
Escanaba High School
Fennville Public Schools:
Anna Michen Upper Elementary
Flint Community Schools:
Science Committee
Farwell Area Schools:
Farwell Elementary
Farwell High School
Hale Area Schools:
Hale Elementary
Hale Middle School
Hastings School District:
Elementary Consortium
Hudsonville Public Schools:
Bauer Elementary
Hudsonville Middle School
Hudsonville High School
Huron County District Consortium:
Bad Axe, Caseville, Harbor Beach, Laker, North Huron
Ida Public Schools:
Ida High School
Ithaca Public Schools:
North Elementary
Ithaca Middle School
Ithaca High Schools
Jackson Public Schools:
Northeast Elementary
Lapeer Community Schools:
Mayfield Elementary
Merrill Community Schools:
Merrill Elementary
Merrill High School
Onsted Community Schools:
Onsted Elementary
Oxford Community Schools:
Oxford Middle School
Pennfield Schools:
Pennfield High School
Pinconning:
Central Elementary
Plymouth Canton Community Schools:
Field Elementary
Pioneer Middle School
Redford Union Schools:
Stuckey Elementary
River Rouge School District:
River Rouge High School
Rochester Community Schools:
University Hills Elementary
Romulus Community Schools:
Cory Elementary
Rudyard Area Schools:
Turner Howson Elementary
Sand Creek Community Schools:
Ruth McGregor Elementary
Southgate Community Schools:
Gerish Elementary
St. Ignace Area Schools:
LaSalle High School
Trenton Public Schools:
Arthur Middle School
Trenton High School
Wayne-Westland Comm. Schools:
Adams Middle School
John Glenn High School
Wyoming Public Schools:
Gladiola Elementary


Strand I: Construct New Scientific and Personal Knowledge

Content Standard 1: All students will ask questions that help them learn about the world; design and conduct investigations using appropriate methodology and technology; learn from books and other sources of information; communicate findings of investigations using appropriate technology. (Constructing)

Elementary

Benchmark:
Generate reasonable questions about the world based on observation. (SCI.I.1.E.1)

Benchmark Clarification:
Students make observations that lead to questions that can be answered through the process of scientific investigation (e.g."Why does the moon appear to change shape?")

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools:
Questions lead to action, including careful observation and testing: questions often begin with "What happens if….?" or "How do these two things differ?"

Real-World Context:
Any in the sections on Using Science Knowledge

Resources:


Benchmark
Develop solutions to problems through reasoning, observation, and investigation. (SCI.I.1.E.2)

Benchmark Clarification
An organized approach to a problem promotes a reasonable solution. Students will develop an approach to a problem using reasoning, observations, data collection, and investigations to arrive at a solution.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

  • Ask questions, gather information, think; observe (K-2)
  • Predict, collect data, draw conclusions, conduct fair tests; prior knowledge. (3-5)

Real-World Context
Any in the sections on Using Scientific Knowledge

Resources:


Benchmark
Manipulate simple devices that aid observation and data collection. (SCI.I.1.E.3)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will observe and collect data by using tools such as magnifying glasses, thermometers, calculators, telescopes, and weather instruments.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools
Various data collection tools suitable for this level, such as

  • Hand lenses
  • Wind direction indicators
  • Grids for sampling areas of the sky or landscape

Real-World Context
Any suggested in Using Scientific Knowledge benchmarks for which students would design and/or conduct investigations

Resources:


Benchmark
Use simple measurement devices to make measurements in scientific investigations.(SCI.I.1.E.4)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will select and use the appropriate measurement tools (e.g. scales, rulers, thermometers, measuring spoons and cups, and measuring tapes) to investigate volume, area, weight, and linear measures.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

Measurement units:

  • Milliliters
  • Liters
  • Teaspoon
  • Tablespoon
  • Ounce
  • Cup
  • Millimeter
  • Centimeter
  • Meter
  • Gram.

Measurement tools:

  • Measuring cups and spoons
  • Measuring tape
  • Scale
  • Thermometers
  • Rulers
  • Graduated cylinders

Real-World Context

  • Making simple mixtures, such as:
    • food
    • play dough
    • papier mache
  • Measuring the height of a person
  • Weighing of a ball

Resources:


Benchmark
Develop strategies and skills for information gathering and problem solving. (SCI.I.1.E.5)

Benchmark Clarification
Scientists use many methods of gathering information and problem solving. To gather information, students will:

  • Ask questions
  • Use different sources such as reference books, trade books, magazines, web sites, and other peoples’ knowledge

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools
Sources of information, such as reference books, trade books, magazines, web sites, other peoples' knowledge.

Real-World Context
Seeking help from or interviewing peers, adults, experts; using libraries, World Wide Web, CD-ROMs, other computer software, and other resources

Resources:


Benchmark
Construct charts and graphs and prepare summaries of observations. (SCI.I.1.E.6)

Benchmark Clarification
Scientists use charts and graphs to visually represent their findings. Students will construct various graphs and charts to present their data. Students will prepare summaries of their observations.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

  • Increase
  • Decrease
  • No change
  • Bar graph
  • Data table

Tools:

  • Graph paper
  • Rulers
  • Crayons

Real-World Context
Examples of bar charts like those found in a newspaper.

Resources:


Middle School

Benchmark:
Generate scientific questions about the world based on observation. (SCI.I.1.MS.1)

Benchmark Clarification:
Children are curious about things from birth, it does not have to be taught. Inquiry into authentic questions generated from student experiences is the central strategy for teaching science. Beginning with their observations, students will describe, explain, and predict natural phenomena. Students will develop questions from their observations that can be answered through scientific inquiry. Students will construct questions about the world in ways that lead to finding answers through investigations, building things, and consulting informational sources.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools:
Scientific questions can be answered by gathering and analyzing evidence about the world.

Real-World Context:
Any in sections on Using Scientific Knowledge

Resources:


Benchmark
Design and conduct scientific investigations. (SCI.I.1.MS.2)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will develop the ability to ask clear questions that can be researched using the scientific method and will design investigations that include the following:

  • Formulate a clear question that can be tested through scientific inquiry
  • Propose a hypothesis that attempts to answer the question with reasons for that answer
  • Develop an organized procedure to test the hypothesis
  • Record data (accurate measurements and careful observations) and report in tables, graphs, and journals
  • Draw conclusions based on evidence presented
  • Discuss errors and alternative explanations for results

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

The process of scientific investigation:
  • Test
  • Fair test
  • Hypothesis
  • Evidence
  • Observations
  • Measurements
  • Data
  • Conclusion
Forms for:
  • Recording data
  • Reporting data
  • Tables
  • Graphs
  • Journals

Real-World Context
In sections on Using Scientific Knowledge; also, recognizing differences between observations and inferences; recording observations and measurements of everyday phenomena

Resources:


Benchmark
Use tools and equipment appropriate to scientific investigations. (SCI.I.1.MS.3)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will safely use specific tools and equipment appropriate to the scientific investigations they are performing.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools
Various data collection tools suitable for this level, including computers.

Real-World Context
Any suggested in Using Scientific Knowledge benchmarks for which students would design and/or conduct investigations.

Resources:


Benchmark
Use metric measurement devices to provide consistency in an investigation. (SCI.I.1.MS.4)

Benchmark Clarification
The metric system is the international system of measurement for scientific inquiry and communication. Students will correctly use metric devices in all scientific investigations (e.g. balance, graduated cylinder, metric stick, thermometer).

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

Documentation:
Laboratory instructions

Measurement units:

  • Milliliters
  • Liters
  • Millimeter
  • Centimeter
  • Meter
  • Gram.

Measurement tools:

  • Balanceing devices
  • Measuring tape
  • Thermometer
  • Graduated cylinders

Real-World Context

Conducting investigations, following or altering laboratory instructions for mixing chemicals.

Resources:


Benchmark
Use sources of information in support of scientific investigations. (SCI.I.1.MS.5)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will utilize a variety of resources including periodicals, reference books, computer software, and web sites to organize, evaluate, and critique information as it relates to scientific investigations.

Students are encouraged to use these same resources to formulate problem statements and develop investigation questions.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools
Tools:

  • Periodicals
  • Reference books
  • Trade books
  • Web sites
  • Computer software
Forms for presenting scientific information:
  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Graphs


Benchmark
Write and follow procedures in the form of step-by-step instructions, formulas, flow diagrams, and sketches. (SCI.I.1.MS.6)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will write and then follow step-by-step instructions for an activity or investigation. Using formulas, flow diagrams, and sketches, students will orally and visually communicate the purpose, procedure, observations, data collection, conclusions, and possible errors of a given investigation.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

  • Purpose
  • Procedure
  • Observation
  • Data
  • Conclusion

Real-World Context
Listing or creating the directions for completing a task, reporting an investigation.

Resources:


High School

Benchmark
Ask questions that can be investigated empirically. (SCI.I.1.HS.1)

Benchmark Clarification
Empirical investigations are based on the results of experiments, observations and/or experiences. In order to formulate a scientific question, a student must have working knowledge about the problem.

Students will:

  • Formulate questions that can be investigated using: testing, measuring, data gathering, observing, and acquiring verifiable information.
  • Investigate and evaluate background information when forming their questions.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools
Questions often build on existing knowledge

Real-World Context
Any in the sections on Using Scientific Knowledge

Resources:


Benchmark
Design and conduct scientific investigations. (SCI.I.1.HS.2)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will:

  • Given a scientific question, be able to:
    1. Form a hypothesis
    2. Design a test or an experiment with a control
    3. Analyze the data they generate
    4. Form a conclusion based on the data and hypothesis
  • Evaluate an experiment to find the key components of a scientific investigation.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

  • Types of scientific knowledge: hypothesis, theory, observation, conclusion, law, data, generalization.
  • Aspects of field research: hypothesis, design, observations, samples, analysis, conclusion.
  • Aspects of experimental research: hypothesis, design, variable, experimental group, control group, prediction, analysis, conclusion. Investigations are based on questions about the world.

Real-World Context
Any suggested in Using Scientific Knowledge benchmarks for which students would design and/or conduct investigations.

Resources:


Benchmark
Recognize and explain the limitations of measuring devices. (SCI.I.1.HS.3)

Benchmark Clarification
In any investigation, measurements are limited by the devices used and the skill of the experimenter. Students should recognize and be able to explain the following factors affecting measurement:

  • Uncertainty is the estimation of a unit beyond the smallest unit of measurement available on a device
  • Error is the amount of difference between an accepted value and a measured value
  • Range is the difference between the highest and lowest measured values
  • Tolerance is the range of uncertainty allowed as determined by a measuring device
  • Accuracy is how close a measurement is to an accepted value
  • Precision is how well measurements are reproduced

Students will use measuring devices listed in the tools section for this benchmark.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

  • Uncertainty
  • Error
  • Range
  • Tolerances
  • Accuracy
  • Precision

Tools:
Balance, measuring tape, thermometer, graduated cylinder, electronic measuring devices.

Real-World Context
Designing an experiment that uses quantitative data

Resources:


Benchmark
Gather and synthesize information from books and other sources of information. (SCI.I.1.HS.4)

Benchmark Clarification
Scientists rely upon more than their own observations and research. They depend upon journal articles, books, computers, reference materials, and other resources to find information. This information is then collected, organized, evaluated and communicated with others.

Students will be able to find, collect, organize, and interpret information that they gather from scientific journals, books, other resources and computer reference materials.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools
Scientific journals, text and computer based reference materials.

Real-World Context
Libraries, technical reference books, World Wide Web, computer software.

Resources:


Benchmark
Discuss topics in groups by making clear presentations, restating or summarizing what
others have said, asking for clarification or elaboration, and taking alternative perspectives and defending a position. (SCI.I.1.HS.5)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will logically and clearly present information that they have gathered through observation, documents, and/or opinions. Students will seek clarification of all information and consider several points of view. Based on the discussion, students will take a position and defend it.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

  • Logical argument
  • Summary
  • Clarification,
  • Elaboration
  • Alternative perspectives.

Real-World Context
Newspaper or magazine articles discussing a topic of social concern.

Resources:


Strand II: Reflect on the Nature, Adequacy, and Connections Across Scientific Knowledge

Content Standard 1: All students will analyze claims for their scientific merit and explain how scientists decide what constitutes scientific knowledge; how science is related to other ways of knowing; how science and technology affect our society; and how people of diverse cultures have contributed to and influenced developments in science. (Reflecting on Scientific Knowledge)

Elementary

Benchmark:
Develop an awareness of the need for evidence in making decisions scientifically. (SCI.II.1.E.1)

Benchmark Clarification:
In the scientific world, decisions must be based on factual evidence that can be replicated.

Students will determine if an explanation is supported by factual data, personal opinion, naïve statement, or misconception.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools:
Observation; (K-2)
Data, evidence, sample, fact, opinion. (3-5)

Real-World Context:
Deciding whether an explanation is supported by evidence gathered in simple experiments,
or relies on personal opinion.

Resources:


Benchmark
Show how science concepts can be illustrated through creative expression such as language arts and fine arts. (SCI.II.1.E.2)

Benchmark Clarification
Creative expressions can be used to build and support science concepts. Students will use creative expression to interpret a science concept through poetry, music, murals, illustrations and movement.
For example:

  • Rainbow Poem
  • Rhythm Band
  • Spring Dance
  • Mural of the Seasons

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

  • Poetry
  • Expository work
  • Painting
  • Drawing
  • Music
  • Diagrams
  • Graphs
  • Charts

Real-World Context
Explaining simple experiments using paintings and drawings; describing natural phenomena scientifically and poetically.

Resources:


Benchmark
Describe ways in which technology is used in everyday life. (SCI.II.1.E.3)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will describe how technology has made their life easier, faster, and more convenient or complex.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools
Provide faster and farther transportation and communication, organize information and solve problems, save time.

Real-World Context
Cars, other machines, radios, telephones, computer games, calculators, appliances, the World Wide Web

Resources:


Benchmark
Develop an awareness of and sensitivity to the natural world. (SCI.II.1.E.4)

Benchmark Clarification
There is a natural balance on Earth that affects all organisms. Students will examine the effects they have on the natural world. Students will show how all organisms relate to and influence the balance in the natural world.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

Appreciation of the balance of nature and the effects organisms have on each other, including the effects humans have on the natural world.

Real-World Context

Any in the sections on Using Scientific Knowledge appropriate to elementary school.

Resources:


Benchmark
Develop an awareness of contributions made to science by people of diverse backgrounds and cultures. (SCI.II.1.E.5)

Benchmark Clarification
Interested and capable people from all cultures and of all ages are encouraged to become part of the scientific community. Students will recognize that all people, regardless of age, race, creed or gender, can and have made important contributions to science.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools
Scientific contributions made by people of diverse cultures and backgrounds.

Real-World Context
Any in the sections on Using Scientific Knowledge appropriate for this benchmark.

Resources:


Middle School

Benchmark:
Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of claims, arguments, or data. (SCI.II.1.MS.1)

Benchmark Clarification:
Claims are formulated through observation, sampling, data collection and analysis. Students will infer and observe in order to evaluate data. Students will examine strengths and weaknesses of observations, data collection, inferences, and explanations, and will dispute claims presented by a variety of media (e.g. videos, graphs, newspaper articles, Internet, textbooks, etc.).

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools:
Aspects of arguments such as data, evidence, sampling, alternate explanation, conclusion, inference, and observation.

Real-World Context:
Deciding between alternate explanations or plans for solving problems; evaluating advertising claims or cases made by interest groups; evaluating sources or references.

Resources:


Benchmark
Describe limitations in personal knowledge. (SCI.II.1.MS.2)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will recognize that they must have multiple resources and conduct multiple trials/tests before making claims, arguments or accepting data. Students must be willing to admit inaccuracies and mistakes, as well as determine differences in data that are significant enough to support or refute claims.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

Recognizing degrees of confidence in ideas or knowledge from different sources, evaluating data and reference sources.

Real-World Context
Any sections on Using Scientific Knowledge

Resources:


Benchmark
Show how common themes of science, mathematics, and technology apply in real-world contexts. (SCI.II.1.MS.3)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will demonstrate an understanding of the interdisciplinary links between math, science and technology by exploring careers and using every day objects. These disciplines integrate common thematic ideas such as:

  • Systems: a collection of parts that function as a whole
  • Model/Scale: a simplified proportional representation
  • Patterns of Change: natural or mathematical repetitions
  • Function: how an object works; its purpose
  • Evolution: the present arises from materials and forms of the past; change over time
  • Scale: a reference to a quality that is both relative and absolute and to the ranges of magnitude in the universe which include such dimensions as size, duration, and speed
  • Energy: the capacity to work or the ability to make matter move

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools
Thematic ideas: systems-subsystems, feedback models, mathematical constancy, scale, conservation, structure, function, adaptation.

Real-World Context
Any in the sections on Using Scientific Knowledge

Resources:


Benchmark
Describe the advantages and risks of new technologies. (SCI.II.1.MS.4)

Benchmark Clarification
There are risks and benefits associated with ever-changing technology. Students will evaluate the advantages, disadvantages, and consequences of technology.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

  • Risk
  • Benefit
  • Side effect
  • Advantage
  • Disadvantage.

Real-World Context

Technological systems for:

  • Manufacturing
  • Transportation
  • Energy distribution
  • Housing
  • Medicine (such as cloning, genetic engineering).

Resources:


Benchmark
Develop an awareness of and sensitivity to the natural world. (SCI.II.1.MS.5)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will describe the balance of nature as how living organisms (producers, consumers and decomposers) and non-living things (water, air, rocks and minerals, natural resources like coal, and energy) interact within their environment. Students will compare and contrast how their actions can affect the balance of nature.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools
Appreciation of the balance of nature and the effects organisms have on each other, including the effects humans have on the natural world.

Real-World Context
Any in the sections on Using Scientific Knowledge appropriate to middle school.

Resources:


Benchmark
Recognize the contributions made in science by cultures and individuals of diverse backgrounds. (SCI.II.1.MS.6)

Benchmark Clarification
Students will have opportunities:

  • To familiarize themselves with perspectives of diverse cultural and racial groups that are traditionally underrepresented in science
  • To have scientific concepts and experiences presented in ways that promote an understanding and appreciation of different cultures and their influence on the nature and structure of the scientific enterprise
  • To have a learning environment that reflects equitable contributions to support and encourage the pursuit of science as a career

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

Cultural contributions made in science, contributions made by people of diverse backgrounds.

Real-World Context
Biographies of minority and female scientists, histories of cultural contributions to science

Resources:


High School

Benchmark:
Justify plans or explanations on a theoretical or empirical basis. (SCI.II.1.HS.1)

Benchmark Clarification:
Students will learn to recognize weaknesses in arguments that are presented as scientific. Arguments may depend on:

  • intermingled fact and opinion
  • small or incorrect data sampling
  • conclusions not supported by evidence
  • failure to consider alternative hypotheses
  • reliance on celebrity rather than evidence
  • failure to consider limitations of available evidence or scientific knowledge

Empirical: Supported by data

Theoretical: Explanation based on accepted scientific processes and reasoning

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools:
Aspects of logical argument, including:

  • Evidence
  • Fact
  • Opinion
  • Assumptions
  • Claims
  • Conclusions
  • Observations.

Real-World Context:
Any in the sections on Using Scientific Knowledge

Resources:


Benchmark
Describe some general limitations of scientific knowledge. (SCI.II.1.HS.2)

Benchmark Clarification
Students learning science will recognize the human origins of scientific knowledge, the particular rules and values of scientific communities, and the strengths and limitations of scientific and technological knowledge. Understanding the nature and limitations of scientific knowledge is essential if students are to use it effectively in making decisions.

Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

Understanding the general limits of science and scientific knowledge as constantly developing human enterprises; recognizing that arguments can have emotive, economic, and political dimensions as well as scientific

    Real-World Context
    Any in the sections on Using Scientific Knowledge

    Resources:


    Benchmark
    Show how common themes of science, mathematics, and technology apply in real-world contexts. (SCI.II.1.HS.3)

    Benchmark Clarification
    Students will show how history, art, mathematics, science, philosophy and technology are inter-related in real world situations.

    Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools
    Thematic ideas: systems/subsystems, feedback, models, mathematical constancy, scale, conservation, structure, function, adaptation.

    Real-World Context
    Any in the sections on Using Scientific Knowledge

    Resources:


    Benchmark
    Discuss the historical development of key scientific concepts and principles. (SCI.II.1.HS.4)

    Benchmark Clarification
    Students will investigate and discuss the history behind key scientific concepts and principles including people, places and events.

    Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

    Historical, political, social, and economic factors influencing the development of science. "Discussing the Earth from the Center of the Universe, Uniting the Heavens and Earth, Relating Matter & Energy and Time & Space, Extending Time, Moving the Continents, Understanding Fire, Splitting the Atom, Explaining the Diversity of Life, Discovering Germs, Harnessing Power" (Benchmarks for Science Literacy, AAAS)

    Real-World Context

    Historical development of key scientific theories.

    Resources:


    Benchmark
    Explain the social and economic advantages and risks of new technology. (SCI.II.1.HS.5)

    Benchmark Clarification
    Students will evaluate the relationship between the benefits that technology can provide and the risks that it presents.

    Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools
    Cost-benefit analysis.


    Benchmark
    Develop an awareness of and sensitivity to the natural world. (SCI.II.1.HS.6)

    Benchmark Clarification
    Students will:

    • Identify the components of the natural world surrounding them
    • Assess how they interact with the natural world, not just the man-made world

    Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

    Appreciation of the balance of nature and the effects organisms have on each other including the effects humans have on the natural world.

    Real-World Context
    Any in the sections on Using Scientific Knowledge appropriate for high school

    Resources:


    Benchmark
    Describe the historical, political, and social factors affecting the developments in science. (SCI.II.1.HS.7)

    Benchmark Clarification
    Students will recognize that the development of scientific knowledge has historically been affected by political, social and economic factors. Students will examine the historical origins of science and make connections between science and other ways of knowing.

    Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools

    Historical, political, social, and economic factors influencing the development of science.

    Real-World Context
    An example might be the development of the sun-centered model of the solar system and political pressures on Galileo; the development of Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection.

    Resources:


    Strand III: Use Scientific Knowledge from the Life Sciences in Real-World Contexts

    Content Standard 1: All students will apply an understanding of cells to the functioning of multi-cellular organisms, including how cells grow, develop, and reproduce. (Cells)

    Middle School

    Benchmark
    Demonstrate evidence that all parts of living things are made of cells (SCI.III.1.MS.1).

    Benchmark Clarification
    All living things/organisms (Glossary) are made of cell(s), the simplest unit of life. Each cell, tissue, and organ has a distinct structure and function(s). These help the organism survive. Although students are more familiar with multi-cellular organisms, most organisms are actually single-celled (such as paramecium, amoebae, bacteria).

    In some multi-cellular organisms, students will:

    • Observe cells in a variety of organisms using microscopes and hand lenses
    • Describe cells in a variety of organisms
    • Demonstrate that specialized cells cooperate to form a tissue (e.g., muscle)
    • Demonstrate that tissues form organs (e.g., heart)
    • Demonstrate that organs form organ systems (e.g., circulatory system)

    Living thing/organism: anything that has the ability to grow, reproduce, take in substances, respond to stimuli, and interact with the environment

    Key Concepts
    Types of living things:

    • plants
    • animals

    See specific functions SCI.III.1.MS.2.

    Parts of organisms:

    • tissues
    • organs
    • organ systems
    • all functions of organisms are carried out by cells

    Tools:

    • microscope
    • hand lens

    Real-World Context
    Common plant or animal cells:

    • Elodea leaf cells
    • onion skin cells
    • human cheek cell

    Single-celled organisms:

    • paramecium
    • ameoba

    Instructional Example SCI.III.1.MS.1

    Benchmark Question: What are cells?
    Focus Question: How can we prove cells make up living things?

    The class will brainstorm what they already know about cells (KWL, small group, large group discussion). Students will observe a variety of cell samples through the use of printed material, videos, multimedia, and lab explorations. Students will use a variety of scientific tools, such as microscopes and hand lenses. Students will compile a log/journal and illustrate their findings about cells from living things or once living things.

    As a class, students will research how scientists have developed an understanding of cells and how they function in living things. Together, students will compile this information to develop a class timeline.

    The teacher should make sure that students expand their understanding of scientific contributions to include scientists from diverse populations (cultures, ethnicity, gender). Such scientists might include the following:

    • Frank Young (CD-ROM link to Biography): conducted extensive research in fundamental genetics of bacteria (1931-)
    • Barbara McClintock (CD-ROM link to Biography): Nobel Prize Winner at age eighty-one; did research in genetics and mutations (1902- )
    • Ernest E. Just (CD-ROM link to Biography): studied cell physiology and understanding life itself and evolution through the study of cells (1883-1941)
    • Katherine Esau (CD-ROM link to Biography): an expert on plant viruses; focused on research on cells and tissues that produce food for plants (1898-)

    Webliography

    Cells.

    Connecting with Learning: An Equity Toolkit. MDE .
    Family Science.

    "Looking Inside an Onion." Microworlds.

    The Lives of Plants. NEW DIRECTIONS UNIT.

    Magnificent Micro-World Adventures. AIMS.

    McCliRuef, Kerry. The Private Eye. The Private Eye Project, 1998.
    Skin/Cells. Bill Nye Video. Disney Educational (800/295-5010)

    LIFE SCIENCE: CELLS
    Frank Edward Young (1931 - )
    GENETIC RESEARCHER AND AIDS FIGHTER
    Frank Edward Young was born just outside New York City in Mineola, Long Island, on September 1, 1931. Following high school, Young went to Union College and earned his medical degree in 1956 from S.U.N.Y. (State University of New York) Upstate Medical Center in Syracuse. He then took on an internship at the University Hospital of Cleveland, Ohio, and later began work toward a Ph.D. in microbiology at Case Western Reserve University, then known as Western Reserve University. Always ambitious, he received his Ph.D. degree in 1962.

    Since then, Dr. Young has held faculty positions and memberships in a number of places. These include the Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation in LaJolla, California; the University of California at San Diego; the School of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Rochester, New York; and the Strong Memorial Hospital, also located in Rochester.

    Dr Frank Young’s primary research focused on the fundamental genetics of the bacteria Bacillus stubtilis and the regulation of bacteria cell surfaces. He also studied the "How and Why" of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) as it relates to bacterial cell transformation. In this process, a bacteria cell called the recipient takes up DNA from its surroundings, and integrates DNA into its own genetic code. The recipient acquires new genes (the DNA) from outside of the cell.

    Through his research, Dr. Young also developed some of the first cloning enzymes and vectors (organism carriers). Clones and vectors have become increasingly important to the study of genetics and cell transformation.

    In 1984, Dr. Young was appointed Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in Washington, D.C. During his time as Commissioner, the FDA approved several drugs and vaccines produced using some of the genetic engineering techniques Dr. Young had helped develop. Most notable of landmarks during his years at the FDA will be the agency’s role in approving effective drugs and vaccines to combat the disease AIDS. Although only one drug actually gained FDA approval at the time, AZT, the FDA has made it possible for other promising drugs and treatments to be legally prescribed to those suffering from the disease.

    References

    Current Biographic Yearbook. 1989. Charles Moritz (ed.). H.W. Wikson Company, NY. pp. 648-649.

    Bacterial Transformation in Microbial Genetics. 1987. David Friefelder (ed.). Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc. Portola Valley, CA. pp. 314-329.

    Dubnau, D. 1976. "Genetic Transformation of Bacillus subtilis: Review With Emphasis on the Recombination Mechanism." in Microbiology (D. Schlessinger, ed.). American Society for Microbiology.

    McCarty, M. 1985. The Transforming Principle: Discovering That Genes are Made of DNA. Norton.

    LIFE SCIENCE: HEREDITY
    Dr. Barbara McClintock (1902 - )
    THE NOBEL PRIZE AT AGE 81
    Sometimes professional recognition and respect can be a long time in coming. Dr. Barbara McClintock certainly knows that to be true, having waited more than a quarter of a century for scientists to take her genetic discoveries seriously.

    Born in Hartford, Connecticut, in 1902, Barbara attended college at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, where she received her graduate degree in 1927.

    Fascinated by the study of transposition, or moving from place to place, Dr. McClintock single-handedly took on the study of transposable genes decades before anyone else even believed it was possible for genes to change their positions.

    She was studying mutations in corn when she noticed that these mutations caused changes in the color and texture of the kernels. Then she noticed that these color changes had definite patterns. This led Dr. McClintock to see whether there was a relationship between developing corn kernels and genetics, and what happened during growth of the corn that affected the genetics of the plant. She learned that mutations were caused by the ability of some of the corn plant’s genes to jump.

    To understand the concept of jumping genes – or transposition (moving from place to place) – the following example may help. Inside a cell is DNA material. This material is referred to as the chromosome(s) [or genome] of the cell. The DNA is organized in a particular order or sequence. Sometimes, sections of this sequence can be moved to a different place within the overall sequence.

    Imagine the DNA sequence is like the letters of the alphabet, lined up side by side in order; A-B-C-, etc. Now, suppose that the letters I-J-K move to a position between B and C. Now the alphabet (DNA sequence) reads: A-B-I-J-K-C-D-. In this example, the clement –I-J -K is like the transposable element or jumping gene.

    Dr. McClintock was clearly ahead of her time in terms of scientific thought. And even though Dr. McClintock’s genetic work began in the 1940’s, it wasn’t until the mid 1970’s that science gave the theory of jumping genes the serious attention it deserved. Many believe that this is why her discoveries and their importance to science were ignored for so long.

    It has been only in the last decade or so that Dr. Barbara McClintock received the recognition to which she is entitled. In 1983, she was awarded the Nobel Prize at the age of 81.

    References

    Breakthrough: Women in Science. Diana C. Gleason. Walker and Co., New York. 1983.

    A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. Evelyn Fox Keller. W. H. Freeman. San Francisco. 1983.

    LIFE SCIENCE: CELLS
    Dr. Ernest E. Just (1883 – 1941)
    PIONEERED RESEARCH ON THE LIVING CELL
    Despite all the contributions he was to make to science, Dr. Ernest E. Just had to fight to "keep aglow the flame within me," even moving to Europe to escape the racism he encountered in the U.S.

    Just was born August 14, 1883 in Charleston, South Carolina. His father, a dockworker, died when Ernest was only four years old. In order to support Ernest and his two siblings, their mother worked two jobs – as a schoolteacher and as a laborer in the phosphate fields outside of town. Young Ernest was forced to work in the crop fields.
    At age 17, and with the courage and foresight of his mother, Ernest was sent North to further his education. It is said that he had only $5 to his name when he left home. Upon reaching New York City, he first entered the Kimball Union Academy preparatory school, where he graduated valedictorian in spite of overwhelming racism. Dartmouth College was next. In only three years, he earned degrees in both biology and history, and was the only student to graduate magna cum laude (with high honors). And, he was inducted into Phi Beta Kappa, one of the most prestigious academic honor societies in this country.

    In 1907, Ernest E. Just became an English teacher at Howard University in Washington, D.C. But, because of the excellence in zoology he displayed at Dartmouth, began teaching biology two years later. He also began work toward his Ph.D. at the Marine Biological Laboratory, located in Maine, in 1909. Summers were spent at the University of Chicago.

    Just completed his zoology doctorate in 1916, some seven years later. Even before completing that degree, however, he was widely praised for inspiring young Blacks to excel in school.

    Just’s scientific endeavors dealt with the study of marine eggs and sperm cells, techniques for their study, the functions of normal verses abnormal cells, and ways they might relate to diseases such as cancer, sickle cell anemia, and leukemia. Just’s theory that the cell membrane (surface) is as important to the life of a cell as its nucleus (center) was much ahead of its time.

    With the 1930’s came recognition of his contributions to knowledge by the American science community. It was during this time that Just was elected vice-president of the American Society of Zoologists, elected a member of the Washington Academy of Sciences, and appointed to the editorial boards of several leading science journals.

    But, for all Just’s success, he found himself alienated from large research institutions, major (White) universities and scientific organizations because of the color of his skin. He hated being referred to as "Negro scientist" and detested feeling "trapped by color" in a segregated United States of America.

    For these reasons, Just found himself attracted to Europe. There, he was free to go to restaurants and the theater. The European scientific community looked to his research, and not to his color, so Just spent much of his career at top laboratories in Germany and France.

    Sadly, Ernest E. Just died of cancer in 1941, two years after returning to the United States.

    Frank R. Lillie, a well-known scientist and friend of Just, described his life this way: "…despite his achievements, an element of tragedy ran through all Just’s scientific career due to the limitations imposed by being a Negro in America…That a man of his ability, scientific devotion, and of such strong personal loyalties as he gave and received, should have been warped in the land of his birth must remain a matter for regret."

    LIFE SCIENCE: CELLS
    Katherine Esau (1898 - )
    EXPERT PLANT VIRUS RESEARCHER
    Katherine Esau was born and raised in what was formerly known as Russia, or the U.S.S.R. It was here that she was educated through her first year of college. Then the Esau family migrated to Germany where she completed her undergraduate college degree. In 1922, she and her family migrated a second time to the United States of America.

    Some time later, Katherine Esau began graduate studies at the University of California (U.C.) in the field of botany. She completed her Ph.D. in 1931 and taught at U.C. Davis until 1963, when she transferred to U.C. Santa Barbara. But, most of Dr. Esau’s research, dealing with effects of viral infection of plants, was performed at the Experiment Station of the Agriculture Department on the Davis campus.

    In order to conduct these kinds of studies, Dr. Esau had to first study normal plants to understand the kinds of changes which occurred once plants became infected with a virus. Through this work, Dr. Esau became an authority on the structure and development of the phloem (plant tissue responsible for transporting food from the leaves to the rest of the plant).

    In researching the effects of viruses on plants, Dr. Esau realized that she had to understand plant cell development – how cells differentiate and become specialized to carry out a particular function or process in the life of the plant.

    Differentiation cay be complicated, but it basically means trying to understand why one plant cell will develop to take part in one life process such as water storage, while another will develop to take part in one life process such as water storage, while another will develop to take part in a totally different life process such as transporting foodstuffs. This kind of reasoning and study is called ontology. Dr. Esau’s work contributed a great deal to our knowledge of the ontology of plants.

    She also realized that, in order to study plant viruses, she had to know a plant’s ontology because the first symptoms of a virus infection occurred in plant parts which were still growing or developing. Further study showed that these viruses would infect only certain cells. For instance, a particular virus only infects cells that store water. By knowing how a cell develops (differentiates) in order to become a water-storage cell, we can then accurately study the effects of that virus infection.

    Dr. Esau’s work led to the discovery of a phloem-limited virus; in other words, a virus which infects only a certain type of complex plant tissue. She also made a significant contribution to the scientific community by showing that the study of the ontology of an organism is important if we are to understand the differences which occur as a result of things such as viral infection.

    References

    Modern Men of Science. 1966. McGraw-Hill Book Company. NY. pp. 157-158

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.1.MS.1

    Based on all the cell samples they have observed, students will create a product providing evidence that all living things are made of cells. This presentation should also highlight one scientist from the timeline and explain his or her contributions. Students may select from a variety of presentation mediums, including illustrations, multimedia presentations, models, posters, prepared slides, or informational books. Students will present their product to the class and explain characteristics of the different cells.

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI. III.1.MS.1
    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Explanation of cells Provides a vague explanation. Provides a brief explanation. Provides an accurate, detailed explanation. Provides an extensive, detailed explanation.
    Evidence of cells Shows an example of a single cell. Shows one or two examples of cells. Shows multiple examples of cells. Shows detailed examples of a variety of cells.
    Explanation of scientific contribution Selects a scientist, but omits the explanation of his or her contribution. Selects a scientist and vaguely explains his or her contribution Selects a scientist and explains his or her contribution. Selects more than one scientist and gives a detailed analysis of their contributions.


    Benchmark
    Explain why and how selected specialized cells are needed by plants and animals (SCI.III.1.MS.2).

    Benchmark Clarification
    Plants and animals are made of specialized cells that make up different tissues, organs, and organ systems. Each organ or organ system is made of specialized cells that carry out the functions of that organ or system.

    • Examples of roles that specialized cells play:
    • Reproduction: Egg and sperm cells carry instructions for creating a new organism
    • Transport: Root and stem cells transport water, minerals, and food
    • Disease-fighting: White blood cells fight disease
    • Photosynthesis: Occurs in plant cells
    • Movement: Muscles and bones are specialized for movement and support

    Students will:

    • Explain the roles of specialized cells

    Key Concepts
    Specialized functions of cells:

    • reproduction
    • photosynthesis
    • transport
    • movement
    • disease-fighting

    • red blood cells
    • white blood cells
    • muscle cells
    • bone cells
    • nerve cells
    • egg/sperm cells

    Specialized plant cells:

    • root cells
    • leaf cells
    • stem cells

    Instructional Example SCI.III.1.MS.2

    Benchmark Question: How are cells adapted to grow, develop, and reproduce?
    Focus Question: Why are specialized cells needed by plants and animals?

    Working in small groups, students will examine a common small plant, such as a marigold. Looking at the plant, students will draw the entire plant and label the three basic organs (leaf, stem, and roots). Next to each organ, the students will:

    • Describe the function or purpose of each part
    • Predict and draw what the cells might look like in each part

    Students will continue investigating plant cells by:

    • Collecting actual cell samples
    • Examining cell samples to determine their functions
    • Analyzing the similarities and differences between their predicted and actual drawings

    Students will also use a similar process to expand their knowledge to include animal cells by:

    • Researching ways cells are specialized in animals and why animals also have a need for specialized cells
    • Selecting one specialized cell and preparing a presentation for the class to explain its structure and function

    Reflecting: (link to SCI.II.1.MS.1).

    Resources/References:

    Webliography

    The Budding Botanist. AIMS.

    The Lives of Plants. NEW DIRECTIONS UNIT.

    "Looking Inside an Onion." Microworlds.

    Ruef, Kerry .The Private Eye. The Private Eye Project, 1998.

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.1.MS.2

    Students will select an organism and one of its specialized cells to research. They will prepare a summary of their research, including information about its structure (visual representation) and function (written summary) that could be used on a class web site.

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.1.MS.2
    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Accuracy of visual representation Shows a sketchy visual of a cell. Displays a visual of a cell structure. Designs an accurate visual of specialized cells. Designs a detailed, comprehensive visual(s) of several specialized cells.
    Completeness of description Provides a vague description of cell function. Describes briefly the cell’s function. Describes the function(s) accurately of the specialized cell. Describes in detail the function(s) of several specialized cells.
    Correctness of format Explains with inappropriate vocabulary or grammar. Explains with partially correct vocabulary and grammar. Explains with appropriate vocabulary and grammar. Explains with extended vocabulary and exceptional grammar.


    High School

    Benchmark
    Explain how multi-cellular organisms grow, based on how cells grow and reproduce (SCI.III.1.HS.1).

    Benchmark Clarification
    The cell is the basic unit of life and comes from preexisting cells.

    Students will use their knowledge of cell theory to:

    • Explain mitosis, meiosis, and differentiation and how they relate to growth in a multi-cellular organism
    • Explain that respiration provides energy for making cell components
    • Describe how the chemical composition of cells originates from outside the cell, such as the products of digested food, which are used as the building blocks by the cell to synthesize more complex chemicals
    • Show how growth of multi-cellular organisms is the result of an increase in the number of cells, not just a change in their size

    Key Concepts (voc.)
    Specialized functions of cells:

    • respiration
    • protein synthesis
    • mitosis
    • meiosis

    Basic molecules for cell growth:

    • simple sugars
    • amino acids
    • fatty acids

    See Respiration SCI.III.2.HS.3.
    See Meiosis SCI.III.3.HS.2.
    See Cells SCI.III.2.MS.4.

    Basic chemicals, molecules, and atoms:

    • water
    • minerals
    • carbohydrates
    • fats and lipids
    • nucleic acids
    • carbon
    • hydrogen
    • oxygen
    • nitrogen

    Cells come only from other cells

    Real-World Context
    The growth of plants and animals e.g., onion.

    Instructional Example SCI.III.1.HS.1

    Benchmark Question: How do multi-cellular organisms grow, based on how cells grow and reproduce?
    Focus Question: Why are multi-cellular organisms made of many small cells instead of one large cell?

    The teacher will give students potato cubes of different sizes (3 cm, 2 cm, 1 cm) to soak in iodine (Lugal’s solution) overnight. The next day they should remove the cubes from the iodine and slice them in half to show how far the iodine entered the cube. Students should write an explanation that associates this movement of iodine with the movement of essential materials moving in and out of a cell. The explanation should include these ideas:

    1. The smaller the cell, the more efficient the movement of materials is for the whole cell.
    2. The more efficient the movement of materials is for the whole cell, the more efficient the cell becomes.

    Constructing: (link to SCI.I.1.HS.1), ().

    Reflecting: (link to SCI.II.1.HS.1).

    Resources/References:
    Webliography.

    Cell photos.

    Cell types.

    Mitosis.

    Mitosis pictures.

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.1.HS.1

    The teacher will give students a written description and include a visual (e.g., picture, diagram, etc.) of how size limits the efficiency of cells to move basic molecules for cell growth. Students will write a description that relates how molecules moving in and out of the cell affect the ability of a cell to function.

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.1.HS.1
    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Accuracy of concepts Explains the concept but in a vague and incomplete way. Explains some concepts but not the relationship. Describes the relationship between material movement and cell function. Describes the relationship with an example or added relevant information.
    Completeness of explanation Explains without supporting details. Explains with partial supporting details. Explains with related details from the activity. Explains with details from the activity and relates to basic molecules.
    Effectiveness of visuals Explains without a visual. Explains with a visual; missing some components. Explains with an accurate and complete visual. Explains with additional examples of visuals.
    Correctness of mechanics Explains with inappropriate vocabulary or grammar. Explains with partially correct vocabulary and grammar. Explains with appropriate vocabulary and grammar. Explains with extended vocabulary and complex sentences.


    Benchmark
    Compare and contrast ways in which selected cells are specialized to carry out particular life functions (SCI.III.1.HS.2).

    Benchmark Clarification
    A cell is an integration of organelles, each performing a specific role that allows the cell to sustain life. Some specific tasks include: reproduction, transport, and photosynthesis.

    Students will:

    • Compare and contrast cells with different functions
    • Determine how cells are specialized to perform specific tasks by relating cell structure to cell function
    • Observe and explain differences among plant, animal, and bacterial cells

    Key Concepts (voc.)
    Classifications of organisms by cell type:

    • plant
    • animal
    • bacteria
    • selected cells

    See Photosynthesis SCI.III.2.MS.3.
    See Reproduction SCI.III.3.HS.2.

    Selected specialized plant and animal cells:

    • red blood cells
    • white blood cells
    • muscle cells
    • nerve cells
    • root cells
    • leaf cells
    • stem cells

    Cell parts used for classification:

    • organelle
    • nucleus
    • cell wall
    • cell membrane

    Specialized functions:

    • reproduction
    • photosynthesis
    • transport

    Cell shape

    Real-World Context
    Specialized plant and animal cells:

    • red blood cells
    • white blood cells
    • muscle cells
    • nerve cells
    • root cells
    • leaf cells
    • stem cells
    • bacteria

    Instructional Example SCI.III.1.HS.2

    Benchmark Question: How are selected cells specialized to carry out particular life functions?
    Focus Question: How does the physical appearance of a cell indicate the possible function of the cell?

    The teacher will have students use pictures of different kinds of specialized cells from books, internet sources, or prepared slides to observe structural differences. Each student will write an explanation of how the overall structure of a cell relates to its function (e.g., a nerve cell.) Students should identify any specific organelles present and relate these organelles to the function of the cell (e.g., chloroplast with photosynthesis in a plant).

    Constructing: (link to SCI.I.1.HS.1), (link to SCI.I.1.HS.4).

    Reflecting: (link to SCI.II.1.HS.1), (link to SCI.II.1.HS.2), (link to SCI.II.1.HS.3).

    Resources/References:
    Webliography.

    Cell pictures.

    Cell types.

    Respiration.

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.1.HS.2

    Each student will design, construct, and label a cell with six or more different structures. Based on the structures used, each student will write a paragraph describing what the cell is able to do.

    (Extension: Have students design a new kind of cell whose primary function is movement.)

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.1.HS.2
    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Construction of cell model Constructs a model with fewer than three accurate labels and structures. Constructs a model with three to five accurate labels and structures. Constructs a model with six accurate labels and structures. Constructs a model with more than six accurate labels and structures.
    Explanation of relationship Explains the relationship between fewer than three structures and the cell’s function. Explains the relationship between three to five structures and the cell’s function. Explains the relationship between six structures and the cell’s function. Explains the relationship between more than six structures and the cell’s function.


    Content Standard 2: All students will use classification systems to describe groups of living things; compare and contrast differences in the life cycles of living things; investigate and explain how living things obtain and use energy; and analyze how parts of living things are adapted to carry out specific functions. (Organization of Living Things)

    Elementary

    Benchmark:
    Explain characteristics and functions of observable body parts in a variety of animals (SCI.III.2.E.1).

    Benchmark Clarification:
    Animals can be sorted by their observable body parts. Students will categorize an animal according to its characteristics and how the characteristics work.
    Examples:

    • Insulation: fur, feathers, blubber
    • Support: exoskeleton (outer), endoskeleton (inner)
    • Food-Getting: claws, beaks, teeth
    • Protection: quills, horns, claws, eyes
    • Movement: legs, wings, fins, webbed feet

    Students will:

    • Categorize an animal according to its characteristics and how those characteristics work
    • Categorize vertebrates – animals with a backbone
    • Categorize invertebrates – animals without a backbone

    Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools:
    Observable characteristics:

    • fur
    • scales
    • feathers
    • horns
    • claws
    • eyes
    • quills
    • beaks
    • teeth
    • skeleton
    • muscles
    • exoskeleton

    Functions:

    • insulation
    • support
    • movement
    • food-getting
    • protection

    Real-World Context:
    Vertebrate and invertebrate animals:

    • humans
    • cows
    • sparrows
    • goldfish
    • spiders
    • insects
    • crayfish

    Instructional Example SCI.III.2.E.1

    Benchmark Question: What are the functions of observable body parts of animals?
    Focus Question: It’s a part; what’s its function?

    Students will select a familiar animal to analyze. All observable body parts of the chosen animal will be listed. Then students will work to put each of the body parts into at least one of the function categories listed in the Benchmark Clarification Section.

    Resources/References:
    Webliography

    All About…Series. Scholastic.
    Backyard Series: Are You a…? Kingfisher.
    Know It All Series. McClanahan.
    Look Once, Look Again Series. CTP.
    National Audubon Society. First Field Guide Series. Scholastic.

    Pictures of animals

    Pictures of animals

    Science of Living Things Series. Crabtree.

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.E.1

    Each student will invent an animal that shows an observable body part for each of the following functions: insulation, support, movement, foodgetting, and protection. Each student must present his or her design in one of the following forms: storybook, flipbook, multi-media presentation, 3D model, or drama.

    This presentation must also include a written explanation of the body’s observable characteristics and the function that each fulfills. Written presentations may be in one of the following forms: story, poem, song, or report.

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.E.1

    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Completeness of design Designs one observable body characteristic for two or fewer of the functions. Designs one observable body characteristic for three of the five functions Designs one observable body characteristic for all five functions Designs more than one observable body characteristic for one or more of the five functions
    Explanation of function Relates one observable body part to fewer than three of the five functions, including details. Relates one observable body part to three of the five functions, including details. Relates one observable body part to each of the five functions with accurate details. Relates all observable body parts to each of the five functions with accurate details.


    Benchmark:
    Compare and contrast (K-2) or classify (3-5) familiar organisms on the basis of observable physical characteristics (SCI.III.2.E.2).

    Benchmark Clarification:
    Plants and animals may have similar and/or different features. Plants and/or animals may be put into groups based on similarities and differences.

    K-2 groups will:

    • Compare and contrast plants (bean) and animals (dog)
    • Compare and contrast body coverings (feathers on a robin, scales on a trout)
    • Compare and contrast edible parts and non-edible parts (apple on a tree, leaves on the same tree)

    3-5 groups will:

    • Compare and contrast flowering (tulip) and non-flowering (philodendron) plants
    • Compare and contrast vertebrates (snake) and invertebrates (worm)
    • Compare and contrast endoskeletons (human) and exoskeletons (lobster)

    Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools:
    Words describing plant and animal parts:

    • backbone
    • skin
    • shell
    • limbs
    • roots
    • leaves
    • stems
    • flowers
    • feathers
    • scales

    Animals that look similar:

    • snakes
    • worms
    • millipedes

    Flowering and non-flowering plants:

    • pine tree
    • oak tree
    • rose
    • algae

    Instructional Example SCI.III.2.E.2

    Benchmark Question: How are groups of living things classified?
    Focus Question: How can observable characteristics help us classify animals?

    Read a biography of Gregor Mendel to students and discuss his contributions to the classification of living things.

    LIFE SCIENCE: HEREDITY
    Johann Gregor Mendel (1822 – 1884)
    DISCOVERING THE LAWS OF HEREDITY

    J. Gregor Mendel was born in Heinzendorf, Austria in 1822. His father was a peasant and his mother was the daughter of a village gardener. In fact, Mendel’s ancestors were professional gardeners of one type or another. So it is no wonder that even as a child, Mendel was encouraged to plant and care for fruit trees.

    The village vicar, who taught natural science to the children, saw that young Mendel had exceptional abilities and urged his parents to send him to a high school in Troppau called the Gymnasium. But, due to his father’s illness, Gregor had to work to support himself and any schooling he wanted.

    Later, he entered the Augustine Monastery as a way of freeing himself of financial burdens and leaving him time to study. (During these times, monasteries were the institutions of higher learning and scientific research.) Here, there was an experimental garden where heredity and evolution in plants was being studied.

    As an adult, Mendel’s most important work took place during a period of about 10 years. It involved experiments in growing and crossing plants (hybridization), as well as gathering, sorting, observing, and counting some 30,000 plants. Mendel worked primarily with the pea plant, which has a small number of physical characteristics. These included height, seed color, seed shape, flower color, seed texture, pod shape, pod and flower color, and position of the pod.

    Mendel studied plants which were "true-breeding" (their offspring always looked just like the parent plants) for different forms of the same physical characteristic. So, if he wanted to look at seed color, for example, he would choose a plant that was true-breeding for yellow seed color and one that was true-breeding for green seed color. He would then cross pollinate the two and observe the offspring. Then he mated members of the offspring (the first filial generation), and looked at their offspring (the second filial generation).

    In general, Mendel found that the parents’ physical characteristics appeared time and time again in the crosses. In the first generation, all the offspring were alike and all showed the physical (phenotypic) characteristics of the "dominant" form. In the second generation, when he crossed two offspring that physically looked alike, Mendel would get mostly plants which looked like the "dominant" form parent and the rest looked like the other parent. (This parent is the "recessive" form or parent.) He also discovered that the ratio of dominant to recessive is about 3:1.

    The work led to the development of the Mendelian laws of inheritance. The first of these is the Principle of Segregation which states that: 1) There are two hereditary determinants for each physical characteristic: 2) Each reproductive cell (gamete) of the plant has only one of the two possible determinants (either member of the pair) and that the two determinants occur the same number of times in the gametes; and 3) When the male and female gametes unite to form the zygote (fertilized egg), this happens randomly.

    Mendel’s second law is known as the Principle of Independent Assortment. It states that the separation or segregation of a pair of alleles happens independently of the segregation of other pairs of alleles when gametes are formed.

    Glossary of terms

    • GENES are the particles of heredity.
    • Each gene has two parts or determinants which are also called ALLELES. Determinants of alleles occur in two different forms, often denoted by using upper and lower case letters.
    • When the two alleles are alike, they are HOMOZYGOUS
    • When the two alleles are different, they are HETEROZYGOUS
    • The actual genetic composition of an organism is the GENOTYPE
    • The physical appearance of an organism is the PHENOTYPE

    References

    Experiments in Plant Hybridization. Gregor Mendel. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. 1965.
    Mendel’s Principles of Heredity. W. Bateson. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 1909.
    Dictionary of Scientific Bibliography. Charles Coulston Gillispie. Charles Scribner & Sons. New York. 1974. Vol. IX, p. 277-283.

    Divide students into groups of four. Provide each group with a container filled with approximately twenty different items. Ask each group to find a small, inconspicuous item in the container. Appoint one student in each group to be the "timer" and record how long it takes the group to find the item.

    Challenge each group to divide the items in their container into three groups or categories. Groups then will explain the criteria they used to group the items. All of the items will then be returned to the container and the students will divide the items into four groups or categories, again providing their rationale. Repeat the process once more, this time challenging the groups to create five subdivisions.

    With the items still sorted into five categories, ask each group to find another small, inconspicuous item and have the "timer" record how long it takes the group to find the item. Bring the whole class together and discuss the differences in the two times. (Reflect on how categorizing the items made it easier to find a specific item.)

    As a class, use one of the team’s groupings and further subdivide. The class will then create a graphic organizer of the new groupings.

    Webliography
    Animal Close-Ups Series. Charlesbridge.
    Animal picture sources: KidPix Studio Deluxe, clip art programs, nature magazines, posters, dichotomous keys.

    Animals.

    Backyard Series. Kingfisher

    "Bones or Not?" Sing the Science Standards (Songbook/CD).

    Creatures Features. AIMS.

    Graphic organizer software.

    It Could Still Be…Series. Children's Press.
    Jackson, Ian. Very Mixed Up Animals. Millbrook Publishers, 1998.

    Sorting All Sorts. AIMS.

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.E.2

    Post the six animal characteristics (backbone, skin, shell, limbs, feathers, and scales) (See Key Concepts). Have students brainstorm a list of animals for each of the six categories. Students should then choose two of the categories. Challenge each student to consider the similarities and differences among the animals in the categories he or she has chosen and to create one more division for each category based on personal observation. Each student will then design a graphic organizer (See graphic organizer in resources) that begins with animals (Level I) and is divided into two of the posted categories (Level II). From there, the student will divide each of the two chosen categories once more based on personal observation (Level III). The graphic organizer is then completed by adding the names of the animals from the original brainstormed list (Level IV).

    Graphic organizer example

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.E.2
    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Completeness of characteristics Completes Level II by choosing two of the posted characteristics (Level III is omitted). Completes Level II by choosing two of the posted characteristics; creates two sub-divisions for one of those characteristics (part of Level III). Completes Level II by choosing two of the posted characteristics; creates two sub-divisions for two of those characteristics (all of Level III). Completes Level II by choosing two of the posted characteristics; creates two or more sub-divisions for each of those characteristics (Level III).
    Completeness of animals Lists all of the animals from the brainstormed list that fit the characteristics (Level IV). Lists all of the animals from the brainstormed list that fit the new divisions (Level IV). Lists all of the animals from the brainstormed list that fit the new divisions (Level IV). Lists all or more animals that fit the new division (Level IV).


    Benchmark:
    Describe life cycles of familiar organisms (SCI.III.2.E.3).

    Benchmark Clarification:
    A life cycle is a series of stages through which all living things (organisms) progress.

    Students will:

    • Sequence the life cycle stages of plants (seed, plant, flower, fruit)
    • Sequence the life cycle stages of animals (egg, young, adult) (egg, larva, pupa, adult)

    Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools:
    Life cycle stages:

    • egg
    • young
    • adult
    • seed
    • plant
    • flower
    • fruit
    • larva
    • pupa

    Real-World Context:
    Common plants and animals:

    • bean plants
    • apple trees
    • butterflies
    • grasshoppers
    • frogs
    • birds

    Instructional Example SCI.III.2.E.3

    Benchmark Question: What are the life cycle stages of living things (organisms)?
    Focus Question: How do plants change as they grow?

    Together, students will plant seeds and create a routine to care for and observe the plants. Students will observe the plants using measurement tools and as many of the five senses as possible. The class will begin recording common observations in a journal as modeled by the teacher. Use of computers or digital cameras would be appropriate. More mature students may record their own observations over a series of days or months. Students will measure the growth of the plants on a daily basis over several weeks and will record the information they gather using a table that will be the basis for a student-generated graph. Students will draw and label (classify) the four stages (seed, plant, flower, fruit) of the plant life cycle they have observed.

    Webliography

    Animal Lives Series. Kingfisher.
    From…To…Series. Orchard.
    How & Why Series. CTP
    How Things Grow Series. Childrens Press.
    Life Cycle Book. AIMS.
    Life Cycles Series. CTP.
    Life Story Series. Troll.

    Seeds

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.E.3

    Students will complete a panel drawing (comic strip) showing the life cycle stages of a plant or animal. Each panel should correspond to one stage in the plant or animal’s life cycle. Drawings must include speech bubbles explaining the stage and what is happening to the organism.

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.E.3

    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Correctness of order Draws at least one life cycle stage. Draws at least two life cycle stages in order. Draws all life cycle stages in order. Draws all life cycle stages in order and includes proper habitat

    -or-

    Expands on one or more of the life cycle stages.

    Completeness of explanation Writes life cycle stage explanation for one drawing. Writes life cycle stage explanations for drawings. Writes life cycle stage explanations for drawings. Writes a detailed life cycle stage explanation for each drawing. Includes explanation of organisms' habitats


    Benchmark:
    Compare and contrast food, energy, and environmental needs of selected organisms (SCI.111.2.E.4).

    Benchmark Clarification:
    All plants and animals have life requirements. Plants and animals obtain and use energy (sunlight and food) from their environment (water, air, minerals, space, and habitat) in a variety of ways. A basic understanding of photosynthesis (link to Glossary) is essential.

    Students will:

    • Compare and contrast how plants obtain and use energy directly from the sun and convert it to produce their own food to how animals use plants or other animals for their food

    Photosynthesis: The formation of a carbohydrate from water and carbon dioxide using the sun’s energy.

    Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools:
    Life requirements:

    • food
    • air
    • water
    • minerals
    • sunlight
    • space
    • habitat

    See SCI.III.5.E.2

    Real-World Context:
    Germinating seeds:

    • beans
    • corn

    Aquarium or terrarium life:

    • guppy
    • goldfish
    • snail

    Instructional Example SCI.III.2.E.4

    Benchmark Question: How do living things obtain and use energy?
    Focus Question: How do the life requirements for a plant and animal compare?

    Students will plant a seed in soil (for example, grass, corn, bean, Wisconsin Fast Plant). In a journal, students will record growth and life requirements (See Key Concepts) Students’ data should contain what the plant needs to survive over a short period of time. The class will create a chart to organize and record data. This chart should include life requirements and energy sources. Students will then observe either an animal (e.g., mealworms) in the environment, classroom, or home and record observations for the same amount of time.

    Students will work in small groups to complete a Venn diagram comparing their plant and animal. Groups will report their results to the class. The class will generalize that animals require food from another source while plants use the sun’s energy to make their own food. The class should conclude that while habitats and food sources may differ, the need for air, food, water, minerals, sunlight, and space are similar.

    Webliography

    Habitat Series. Barron’s.
    Himmelman, John. Dandelion’s Life. Childrens Press, 1999.
    Maestro, Betsy. Why Do Leaves Change Color? Harper, 1994.

    "Special Needs." Sing the Science Standards (Songbook/CD)

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.E.4

    Students will create a graphic organizer displaying the following information for a selected plant and animal: food, air, water, sunlight, habitat, and food source. Using this information, students will construct a labeled three-dimensional model (diorama) that compares the life requirements of their plant to their animal. (Students should use half of the box for the plant, half of the box for the animal.)

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Completeness of graphic organizer Shows two of the life requirements for both plant and animal. Shows three of the life requirements accurately for both plant and animal. Shows four of the life requirements accurately for both plant and animal. Shows food source accurately Shows all of the life requirements for both plant and animal. Shows food source accurately
    Construction of plant life requirements Constructs two of the life requirements in the diorama Constructs three of the life requirements in the diorama Constructs four of the life requirements in the diorama Constructs five or more of the life requirements in the diorama
    Construction of animal life requirements Constructs two of the life requirements in the diorama Constructs three of the life requirements in the diorama Constructs four of the life requirements in the diorama Constructs five or more of the life requirements in the diorama


    Benchmark:
    Explain the functions of selected seed plant parts (SCI.III.2.E.5).

    Benchmark Clarification:
    All plants have parts that perform a specific function (job) to keep the plant alive. Each part of a plant works to support a plant’s life.

    Students will:

    • Explain how roots anchor the plant and take in water and minerals
    • Explain how stems provide support and carry water, minerals, and food to all parts of the plant
    • Explain how leaves make food (site of food production)
    • Explain how flowers produce fruit and attract pollinators (bees, birds, etc.)
    • Explain how fruits hold and disperse seeds
    • Explain how seeds carry embryos (link to Glossary) for new plants

    Embryo: An undeveloped plant within a seed.

    Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools:
    Plant parts:

    • roots
    • stems
    • leaves
    • flowers
    • fruits
    • seeds

    See SCI.III.4.E.2, functions of selected animal body parts.

    Real-World Context:
    Common edible plant parts:

    • bean
    • cauliflower
    • carrots
    • apples
    • tomatoes
    • celery
    • spinach

    Instructional Example SCI.III.2.E.5

    Benchmark Question: How does each part of a seed plant support the plant’s life?
    Focus Question: What are the functions of seed plant parts?

    Begin by reading a biography about plant expert Katherine Esau.

    LIFE SCIENCE: CELLS
    Katherine Esau (1898 - )
    EXPERT PLANT VIRUS RESEARCHER

    Katherine Esau was born and raised in what was formerly known as Russia, or the U.S.S.R. It was there that she was educated through her first year of college. Then the Esau family migrated to Germany where she completed her undergraduate college degree. In 1922, she and her family migrated a second time and came to the United States of America.

    Some time later, Katherine Esau began graduate studies at the University of California (U.C.) in the field of botany. She completed her Ph.D. in 1931 and taught at U.C. Davis until 1963, when she transferred to U.C. Santa Barbara. But, most of Dr. Esau’s research, dealing with effects of viral infection in plants, was performed at the Experiment Station of the Agriculture Department on the Davis campus.

    In order to conduct these kinds of studies, Dr. Esau had to first study normal plants to understand the kinds of changes which occurred once plants became infected with a virus. Through this work, Dr. Esau became an authority on the structure and development of the phloem (plant tissue responsible for transporting food from the leaves to the rest of the plant).

    In researching the effects of viruses on plants, Dr. Esau realized that she had to understand plant cell development – how cells differentiate and become specialized to carry out a particular function or process in the life of the plant.

    Differentiation may be complicated, but it basically means trying to understand why one plant cell will develop to take part in one life process such as water storage, while another will develop to take part in a totally different life process such as transporting foodstuffs. This kind of reasoning and study is called ontology. Dr. Esau’s work contributed a great deal to our knowledge of the ontology of plants.

    She also realized that, in order to study plant viruses, she had to know a plant’s ontology because the first symptoms of a viral infection occurred in plant parts which were still growing or developing. Further study showed that these viruses would infect only certain cells. For instance, a particular virus may only infect cells that store water. By knowing how a cell develops (differentiates) in order to become a water-storage cell, we can then accurately study the effects of that viral infection.

    Dr. Esau’s work led to the discovery of a phloem-limited virus; in other words, a virus which infects only a certain type of complex plant tissue. She also made a significant contribution to the scientific community by showing that that studying the ontology of an organism is important if we are to understand the differences which occur as a result of things such as viral infection.

    References

    Modern Men of Science. 1966. McGraw-Hill Book Company. NY. Pp. 157-158

    As a review of plant parts and their functions, have children in small groups play "Concentration" where they match a plant part card with the correct function card (link to Benchmark Clarification SCI.III.2.E.5). Lead class discussion to insure correct matches. Provide examples of foods that represent each part of a plant:

    Food Part Function
    bean seed carries embryo for new plant
    cauliflower flower produces fruit and attracts pollinators
    carrots root anchors plant and takes in water and minerals
    tomatoes fruit holds and disperses seeds; protects embryo
    spinach leaf makes food (site of food production)
    celery stem provides support and carries water, minerals, and food to all parts of the plant

    Have students identify each item. In small groups, as food is passed to each group, have students classify each food as a root, stem, leaf, flower, fruit, or seed. Have groups record their placements on a chart or board visible to everyone. Through class discussion, clarify the part of the plant each food represents.

    Resources/References:
    Webliography

    Mayes, Susan. What Makes a Flower Grow? Usbourne, 1989.

    Plant parts

    "Salad Nutrition Chart." Grow Lab: Activities for Growing Minds.

    "Seed Plants." Sing the Science Standards (Songbook/CD).

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.E.5

    Students will create a salad made of plant parts. They will incorporate each plant part in the salad. They will identify the part and the function of each part through a written "menu," a labeled diagram, or an oral presentation about the salad.

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring for Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.E.5
    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Completeness of plant parts Creates salad containing two or three plant parts Creates salad containing four or five plant parts Creates salad containing all plant parts. Creates salad containing more than one of each of the plant parts.
    Identification of plant parts Identifies two or three plant parts. Identifies four or five plant parts. Identifies six plant parts Identifies six plant parts
    Functions of plant parts Identifies a function of two or three plant parts. Identifies a function of four or five plant parts. Identifies a function of six plant parts. Identifies more than one of the functions of the six plant parts.


    Middle School

    Benchmark
    Compare and classify organisms into major groups on the basis of their structure (SCI.III.2.MS.1).

    Benchmark Clarification
    Organisms are classified based on related characteristics. Although "species" is the basic unit of classification, students should not be concerned with the formal five-kingdom classification system at this time.

    Students will:

    • Compare and contrast similar characteristics in structure, such as physical appearance, anatomy, and reproduction
    • Use these characteristics to arrange organisms into different groups (e.g., plants: flowering/non-flowering and animals: vertebrate/invertebrate, single-celled/multi-cellular, cold-blooded/warm-blooded)
    • Classify organisms into smaller groups (e.g., vertebrates: mammals, fish, birds, amphibians, reptiles)

    Key Concepts
    Characteristics used for classification:

    • vertebrates/invertebrates
    • cold-blooded/warm-blooded
    • single-celled/multi-cellular
    • flowering/non-flowering

    Groups of vertebrates:

    • mammals
    • birds
    • fish
    • reptiles
    • amphibians

    Observation tools:

    • hand lens
    • microscope

    Real-World Context
    Representative organisms:

    • dog
    • worm
    • snake
    • amoeba
    • geranium
    • bacteria
    • insect
    • mold

    Instructional Example SCI.III.2.MS.1

    Benchmark Question: How are groups of living things classified?
    Focus Question: Using a variety of classification systems, how can we classify different groups of organisms?

    Students need several experiences classifying organisms in order to understand better the key scientific concepts of diversity and unity of living things. Each student should be given a similar set of 15 to 20 pictures of vertebrate and invertebrate animals. Students should then sort the pictures into different groups, according to their own classification system. Have them repeat this process two more times, using different classification rules each time. Students then will record each sort on paper, give each group a title, and list common characteristics they used to classify these organisms.

    Next, students will form pairs and share their data. Each team will use their data to select a system they think will work best. The teacher should continue to combine pairs of students and have them share their method until the entire class agrees upon one system.

    Discuss, as a class, the titles for each group and identify characteristics for each group of organisms.

    Students should become familiar with the terminology contained in the key concepts. They should also be introduced to more formal classification systems, such as a dichotomous key (a tool used by scientists to classify organisms).

    Webliography.

    The Budding Botanist. AIMS.
    Exploring Environments. AIMS.

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.MS.1

    Students will classify a variety of organisms into groups according to their structure. Students will use the following categories:

    • vertebrate/invertebrate
    • categories of vertebrates:
      • mammals
      • birds
      • fish
      • amphibians
      • reptiles
    • single-celled/multi-cellular
    • flowering/non-flowering

    These categories could be used in class games such as Jeopardy or Concentration.

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.MS.1
    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Correctness of classification Classifies with 60%-69% accuracy Classifies with 70%-79% accuracy. Classifies with 80%-99% accuracy. Classifies with 100% accuracy.
    Identification of common characteristics Lists one common characteristic for each category. Lists two common characteristics for each category. Generalizes several key characteristics for each category. Compiles a detailed description of common characteristics for each category.


    Benchmark
    Describe the life cycle of a flowering plant (SCI.III.2.MS.2).

    Benchmark Clarification
    Flowering plants, just like animals, have distinct stages in their life cycles. Fertilization, the first stage of a flowering plant, involves the union of egg and sperm. Seeds, which contain the embryos and their food, form in the ovary as a result of the egg/sperm union. As the seeds mature and the fruit ripens, the seeds may be dispersed. If conditions are favorable, the seed coat cracks open and the embryonic plant emerges (the seed germinates) and a mature plant develops with roots, stems, leaves, and flowers. The cycle of the flowering plant is ready to begin again.

    Students will:

    • Locate the structure where sex cells form in a variety of flowers
    • Identify the stages of growth from seed to mature plant

    Key Concepts
    Flowering plant parts and processes:

    • roots
    • stems
    • leaves
    • flowers
    • fruits
    • seeds
    • embryo
    • pollen
    • ovary
    • egg cell
    • germination
    • fertilization

    Tools:

    • microscope
    • hand lens

    Real-World Context
    Common flowering plants:

    • bean
    • tulip

    Instructional Example SCI.III.2.MS.2

    Benchmark Question: What are the life cycles of living things?
    Focus Question: What are the predictable stages of the life cycle of a flowering plant?

    Students will dissect a variety of flowers to observe their structures. Dissection should be done carefully and sequentially, so structural parts are kept together. Students should then place a sheet of black construction paper on a table and gently tap the flower to collect pollen on the paper. They should examine the pollen under the microscope.

    Specifically, they should:

    1. Remove the petals and sepals to allow for closer observation
    2. Examine the pollen-producing structures (stamens) and remove them carefully
    3. Observe the remaining ovary structure by carefully slicing the ovary vertically in half. (Because this is a mature flower, fertilization has already taken place, meaning that the egg and sperm have already united and formed the tiny seeds they may see.)

    Students should then discuss the role the flower plays in the life cycle of a plant. They should examine a variety of seeds, such as a lima bean, to observe the embryonic plants inside. They should hypothesize which areas will develop into the roots, stem(s), and leaves.

    Then the students should design an investigation to determine what effect one variable might have on the life cycle of a flowering plant (e.g., photo-period [amount of sunlight], temperature, soil composition, water, fertilizer, competition [number of plants], acid rain).

    Self-Evaluation Checklist for the Investigation

    1. Problem
      • Have you clearly stated the problem you investigated?
      • What variables did you investigate?
    2. Experiment
      • Are your instructions for each step written clearly and completely enough so that someone else could easily replicate your investigation?
    3. Results
      • Are your data organized in a table, chart, or graph?
      • Are your tables, charts, or graphs properly labeled?
    4. Conclusions
      • Are your conclusions fully supported by your data?
      • How valid are your conclusions or results?
      • In what specific ways could your experiment be improved?

    Resources/References:

    Webliography.

    "Flower Study," Budding Botanist. AIMS.

    "Plants from Seeds." GrowLab: Activities for Growing Minds.

    Plants/Forests. Bill Nye Video. Disney Educational (800/295-5010).

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.MS.2

    Students will create a model (PowerPoint presentation, flip-book, flowchart, picture book, song, poem) illustrating the development of a flowering plant (seedplant flower [fertilization/fruit development] cycling back to seed).

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.2.MS.2
    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Correctness of plant development sequence Shows inaccurate sequence of developmental stages of a flowering plant. Illustrates partial sequence of developmental stages of a flowering plant. Illustrates proper sequence of developmental stages of a flowering plant. Illustrates detailed examples of numerous flowering plants moving through their developmental stages.


    Benchmark
    Describe the evidence that plants make and store food (SCI.III.2.MS.3).

    Benchmark Clarification
    Students have misconceptions about food energy. Food provides the energy and raw materials needed for cell functions. Plants go through a special "food-making" process called photosynthesis.

    Students will:

    • Observe chloroplasts in special plant cells
    • Determine the location in specialized plant cells where photosynthesis occurs
    • Explain that during photosynthesis certain raw materials (carbon dioxide and water) are taken in and chemically combined to form new products (sugar and oxygen)
    • Recognize that the sun’s light energy is converted and stored as chemical energy in food; this food may be used immediately or stored as starch for later use
    • Examine various food storage organs (e.g., potatoes, onions, carrots)

    Key Concepts
    Process and products of food production and transport:

    • photosynthesis
    • starch
    • sugar
    • oxygen
    • carbon dioxide
    • water
    Plant food storage organs:

    • potato
    • onion

    Starch storage in plants grown under different conditions

    Instructional Example SCI.III.2.MS.3

    Benchmark Question: How do living things obtain and use energy?
    Focus Question: What evidence is there that plants make and store food?

    Students will:

    • Observe chloroplasts in special plant cells by looking at plant leaves under a microscope. (If needed, prepared slides may be used to help students in locating the chloroplasts.)
    • Draw a diagram of what they observe under the microscope.
    • Discuss their data and observations with others to determine the location of specialized plant cells where photosynthesis occurs.

    The teacher will explain the following:

    • During photosynthesis, certain raw materials (carbon dioxide + water) are taken in and chemically combined in the chloroplast to form new products (sugar and oxygen).
    • The plant then uses the sugar immediately as food or stores it as starch in a special food storage organ.

    In order to develop an understanding of how plants store food, students will examine various food storage organs (e.g., potatoes, onions, carrots). They will conduct a simple iodine/starch test to discover that the storage organ is a vessel that plants use to store food energy.

    A simple iodine starch test involves dropping iodine solution on a piece of food. Initially, iodine appears reddish-brown in color. When iodine comes in contact with starch, it turns to a bluish-black indicating the presence of starch.

    Then, students will participate in a guided discussion of the food storage organs:

    1. What happens to a food storage organ in your cupboard? (Gets smaller, starts to grow sprouts, develops brown spots.)
    2. Why is this happening? (It is losing water, growing roots, decomposing [chemical change.])
    3. Where is it getting the energy to grow sprouts? (From the food energy stored within the cells of the storage organ.)

    Students will design an investigation to test their hypothesis about what is happening to their potato, onion, or carrot.

    Follow up with a discussion and presentation of data from the investigations.

    End the lesson with a "Did You Know…" i.e., Native Americans in South and Central America first cultivated many tuber plants, like the potato. One of these plants has erroneously been called the Irish potato. Its fried version is called French fries. Ask the students to talk about what observations they can make from this interesting story.

    Resources/References:
    Webliography.

    "Basic Needs," GrowLab: Activities for GrowingMinds.

    The Budding Botanist. AIMS.

    "The Eyes Have It," GrowLab: Activities for Growing Minds.


    High School

    Benchmark
    Explain how characteristics of living things are passed on from generation to generation (SCI.III.3.HS.1).

    Benchmark Clarification
    Characteristics of living things are passed on from generation to generation by an organism’s genes.

    Students will:

    • Diagram how the gene pair in one parent will separate and make sex cells that will combine with a sex cell from the other parent to form offspring
    • Predict the characteristics of possible offspring, given the gene combinations of the parents
    • Trace a trait from generation to generation (e.g., sickle cell anemia)

    Key Concepts (voc.)
    Traits:

    • dominant
    • recessive

    Genetic material:

    • gene pair
    • gene combination
    • gene sorting

    Real-World Context
    Common contexts:

    • inheritance of a human genetic disease/disorder:
      • sickle cell anemia
    • a family tree focused on certain traits
    • examining animal or plant pedigrees

    Instructional Example SCI.III.3.HS.1

    Benchmark Question: How are characteristics of living things passed on from generation to generation?
    Focus Question: How can a trait be traced from generation to generation?

    Each pair of students will create a pedigree chart based on a given characteristic (attached and free ear lobes, sickle cell anemia, tongue rolling, etc)*. Students should identify dominant and recessive gene combinations (e.g., aa, Aa, AA, A? [can’t be determined]) for individuals on the chart.

    Extension: Predict the possible gene combinations and physical traits for a cross with one of your offspring and a recessive individual.

    * Teachers should be aware that this only works for single allele traits (not hair color, eye color, etc.).

    Resources/References:
    Webliography.

    Gerbil genotypes.

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.3.HS.1

    The teacher will give a pedigree chart with phenotypes listed for all individuals to each student. Each student will provide the gene combinations for all individuals (e.g., aa, AA, Aa, A?).

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.3.HS.1
    The number of correctly identified gene combinations is the student’s score.

    Meeting the standard is a score of 80% or more.


    Benchmark
    Describe how genetic material is passed from parent to young during sexual and asexual reproduction (SCI.III.3.HS.2).

    Benchmark Clarification
    Genetic material is passed from parent to young during sexual reproduction or asexual reproduction.

    Students will:

    • Compare and contrast the processes of meiosis (CD-ROM link to Glossary) and mitosis (CD-ROM link to Glossary)
    • Compare and contrast sexual reproduction (CD-ROM link to Glossary) and asexual reproduction (CD-ROM link to Glossary)
    • Explain how DNA replicates
    • Explain why sexual reproduction provides greater variation in individuals, and within a population, compared to asexual reproduction

    Meiosis: type of cell division that results in daughter cells with the haploid (half) number of chromosomes, occurs during the production of eggs and sperm

    Mitosis: type of cell division in which daughter cells receive the exact chromosome number and genetic makeup of the parent cell, occurs during cell growth and repair

    Sexual reproduction: reproduction in which the union of two nuclei, usually of different genetic makeup, results in the formation of a single new nucleus

    Asexual reproduction: reproduction without sex, without the union of two sets of chromosomes

    Key Concepts (voc.)
    Types of cell division:

    • mitosis
    • meiosis

    DNA replication, chromosome

    Types of reproduction:

    • sexual
    • asexual

    Genetic variation

    Tools:

    • A-V media
    • diagrams showing DNA replication during cell division

    Real-World Context
    Fruit flies, yeast, reproduction by spores, cloning

    Instructional Example SCI.III.3.HS.2

    Benchmark Question: How does genetic material pass from parent to young during sexual and asexual reproduction?
    Focus Question: How does DNA replicate?

    With each student representing a nitrogen base, students will model the replication of DNA.

    Example: Give students cards with the nitrogen bases of DNA (adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine). Have one-quarter of the students form a single chain with their bases. Other students should then match their complementary bases to the first strand to form one double strand. The teacher acts as the enzyme to unzip the DNA and form two single strands. The teacher then matches new complementary bases to the bases in the original two strands. Students should compare the two new strands to each other and to the original strand. After replicating DNA, the class will discuss how this replication of DNA relates to cell division.

    Reflecting: None

    Resources/References:
    Webliography.

    Meiosis.

    Mitosis.

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.3.HS.2

    With a partner, students will write a story in which a student becomes a nitrogen base. Each pair of students will explain the events, step by step, that happen to the student (nitrogen base) from the beginning to the end of DNA replication. Each pair of students will use their knowledge of this scientific process and appropriate scientific vocabulary in the story.

    Extension:

    1. Research cloning and present a speech explaining reasons for or against human cloning.
    2. Research gene manipulation and present a speech explaining reasons for or against gene manipulation.)

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.3.HS.2
    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Accuracy of DNA replication

    Provides an account of the steps of DNA replication with more than one error.

    Provides an account of the steps of DNA replication with one error. Provides an accurate account of the steps of DNA replication. Provides an accurate account of the steps of DNA replication with creativity.
    Correctness of mechanics Explains with inappropriate vocabulary or grammar. Explains with partially correct vocabulary or grammar. Explains with appropriate vocabulary and grammar. Explains with extended vocabulary and exceptional grammar.

    Provides an account of the steps of DNA replication with more than one error.


    Benchmark
    Explain how new traits may be established in individuals/populations through changes in genetic material (DNA) (SCI.III.3.HS.3).

    Benchmark Clarification
    New traits may be established in individuals/populations through changes in genetic material.

    Students will:

    • Show how a mutation (CD-ROM link to Glossary) in a nucleotide sequence may show up as a change in the trait of the individual
    • Identify mutation-causing factors in the environment
    • Debate the positive and negative effects of human manipulation of the DNA
    • Show how a beneficial trait would become part of the genetic materials in members of a population

    Mutation: an inheritable change in the sequence of bases within a gene

    Key Concepts (voc.)
    Genetic changes:

    • variation
    • new gene combinations
    • mutation

    See How new traits become established in populations SCI.III.4.MS.2.

    Natural and human-produced sources of mutation:

    • radiation
    • chemical

    Real-World Context
    Products of genetic engineering:

    • medical advances
      • insulin
      • cancer drugs
    • agricultural-related products
      • navel oranges
      • new flower colors
      • higher-yield grains
    • effects of natural and man-made contamination

    Examples of variations due to new gene combinations:

    • hybrid organisms
    • new plant varieties resulting from multiple sets of genes

    Instructional Example SCI.III.3.HS.3

    Benchmark Question: How are new traits established in individuals/populations through changes in genetic material (DNA)?
    Focus Question: What are the positive and negative effects of agricultural chemicals that may cause mutations?

    In small groups of four, students will research agricultural chemicals commonly used on apples, cherries, oranges, corn, wheat, and oats. Two students will take a positive position and two students will take a negative position based on the facts they discover in their research. Each student should represent a specific group. Opposing groups could include parents expecting a child, scientists, agricultural companies, farmers, and local governmental and environmental groups.

    Students will debate the positive and negative effects of agricultural chemicals that may cause mutations. The debate will be presented to the class as a forum for a state committee on agricultural chemical use.

    Note: Role-plays of this type work best if there is a middle-of-the-road group to help the extremes come to some consensus.

    Resources/References:
    Webliography.

    DNA Manipulation.

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.3.HS.3

    Each student will pick from a pile of cards marked pro and con for agricultural chemical use that may cause mutations. Each student will write a position paper based on the card that states the position and supports the position with factual information cited in the debate or found in the research.

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.3.HS.3
    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Clarity of Position Misstates the card’s position. States the card’s position with some vagueness. States the card’s position in a clear manner. States the card’s position in a convincing manner.
    Accuracy of position States the card’s position in an inaccurate manner. States the card’s position with one inaccuracy. States the card’s position in an accurate manner. States the card’s position in an accurate and thoughtful manner.
    Validity of evidence States no supporting arguments. States one to two valid supporting arguments. States three valid supporting arguments. States more than three valid supporting arguments.
    Correctness of mechanics Explains with inappropriate vocabulary and grammar. Explains with partially correct vocabulary and grammar. Explains with appropriate vocabulary and grammar. Explains with extended vocabulary and exceptional grammar.


    Content Standard 4: All students will explain how scientists construct and scientifically test theories concerning the origin of life and evolution of species; compare ways that living organisms are adapted (suited) to survive and reproduce in their environments; and analyze how species change through time. (Evolution)

    Elementary

    Benchmark:
    Explain how fossils provide evidence about the nature of ancient life (SCI.III.4.E.1).

    Benchmark Clarification:
    Scientists who find and use fossils to create an understanding of the past are paleontologists (CD-ROM link to Glossary). A fossil is one of many tools used by scientists to study the history of life on Earth.

    Fossils can take many forms:

    • An impression of a dead plant or animal that has been replaced by minerals
    • A cast formed by filling in spaces left from footprints or decaying bodies
    • A mold, plant, or animal trapped in tree sap (amber)
    • A preserved specimen of life from a specific time

    Students will:

    • Identify the following types of fossils:
      1. An impression of a dead plant or animal that has been replaced by minerals
      2. A mold of a footprint or a decaying body that has been filled in with sand/clay
      3. A fragment/whole animal that has been trapped in tree sap
    • Match fossils with the time period when they were most likely formed
    • Explain another tool scientists use to study the history of life on Earth

    Paleontologist: A scientist who studies fossils.

    Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools:
    Words describing types of evidence:

    • fossil
    • extinct
    • ancient
    • modern life forms

    See SCI.V.I.E.4.

    Real-World Context:
    Common contexts:

    • plant and animal fossils
    • museum dioramas
    • paintings/drawings of ancient life and/or habitats

    Instructional Example SCI.III.4.E.1

    Benchmark Question: How do scientists acquire evidence about the nature of ancient life?
    Focus Question: How are Earth’s layers used to determine the age of a fossil?

    Begin by reading a biography about Mary Anning (see resources).

    Students will create a model of fossil layers similar to the Earth’s. Each pair of students will use approximately one-third of a can of play dough (all one color or three separate colors) and two small items (twigs, leaves, bark, seeds, dead insects, fruit rinds, chicken bones, small shells, or small plastic insects) to make fossil layers in a paper cup. Guide students through the following steps: Put one-third of the play dough in the bottom of the cup, put a specimen on top of the play dough, cover it with another one-third of the play dough and press, put the second specimen on top of this layer, and cover with the remaining one-third of the play dough and press. Students then will discuss which layers in the cup are the oldest and youngest. Students will explain how this activity is similar to the idea that the age of a fossil layer is determined by the order in which it was formed.

    Resources/References:
    Anning, Mary.

    Biographies & fossil information.

    "Changes over Time." A Second Grade Unit by the Battle Creek Area Mathematics & Science Standards.

    "Fossils, Fossils." Sing the Science Standards (Songbook/CD).

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.4.E.1

    The teacher will collect and redistribute cups, making sure that students do not receive their own cups. Students will open their cups by carefully tearing them down the sides. Students should carefully explore the shapes and patterns that were made by their casts. With a cautious approach, students may be able to keep the molds of their specimens intact. The teacher will ask students which specimens made a good impression or disintegrated, and which lived at an earlier time or lived later. Students will draw conclusions and present their findings based on their observations.

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.4.E.1
    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Identification of layers Recognizes that objects were buried at different levels (layers). Locates at least two distinct layers. Locates all layers and finds evidence of fossils Locates all layers and explains that fragile materials disintegrate and therefore not all plants and animals from the past made fossils.
    Demonstration of scientific methods Preserves some evidence of the layers. Preserves layers and some of the casts Preserves the layers and the casts. Works meticulously like a paleontologist and identifies the specimens precisely.
    Accuracy of relationships Explains that some plants/animals lived a long time ago Recognizes that fossils exist within layers of the Earth. Describes the relationship between layers and the age of specimens. Provides evidence that not all members of a species (i.e., dinosaurs) became extinct at once

    -or-

    Links climate and other natural disasters with fossil findings


    Benchmark:
    Explain how physical and behavioral characteristics of organisms help them to survive in their environments (SCI.III.4.E.2).

    Benchmark Clarification:
    Organisms have physical and behavioral characteristics (adaptations) that help them survive. Different parts and/or behaviors of an organism help it survive in its living area (environment).

    Students will:

    • Explain the physical adaptation of owls – they have talons to catch small animals
    • Explain the behavioral adaptation of bears – they learn to forage in state parks or dumps
    • Explain the instinct adaptation of salmon – they swim upstream to mate
    • Explain the physical adaptation of plants – they grow toward a light source

    Key Concepts (voc.)/Tools:
    Words describing characteristics:

    • adaptation
    • instinct
    • learning
    • habit

    Words describing traits and their adaptive values:

    • sharp teeth or claws for catching and killing prey
    • color for camouflage
    • behaviors

    Real-World Context:
    Common vertebrate adaptations:

    • white polar bears
    • sharp claws and sharp canines for predators
    • changing colors of chameleon

    Behaviors:

    • migration
    • communication of danger

    Instructional Example SCI.III.4.E.2

    Benchmark Question: In what ways are living things adapted (suited) to survive in their environments?
    Focus Question: How does an animal’s camouflage affect its survival?

    Divide the class into small groups. Using four different colors of construction paper, prepare a set of 12 fish of each color (48 fish in all) for each group. One set of twelve fish must be the same blue as the blue paper "water" habitat. Create "water" habitat by cutting a pond shape from a piece of large blue paper and placing it on the floor. In turn, each child in the group will use one hand to pick up ("catch") as many fish as possible, one fish at a time, in 10 seconds. All results will be charted. Compile total class data. Through class discussion of the data, respond to the focus question.

    Reflecting: (link to SCI.II.1.E.1).

    Resources/References:
    Webliography

    All About Series. Scholastic.

    Critters. "Table Manners," "Hide and Seek," "Gone Fishing." AIMS.
    http://www.aims.edu.org/aimscatalog/

    Endangered Series. Crabtree.
    Hide & Seek Series. Childrens Press.
    How & Why Series. CTP.

    Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.4.E.2

    Each student will invent an animal and design an environment (2D or 3D) that will support the invented animal. Students will develop and explain three physical adaptations and one behavioral adaptation that the animal uses to survive in the environment. Each student will then present the model in class with a two-minute presentation.

    (Give students rubric before activity.)

    Scoring of Classroom Assessment Example SCI.III.4.E.2
    Criteria Apprentice Basic Meets Exceeds
    Design of environment Designs (with teacher support) an environment that partially camouflages the animal. Designs (with teacher support) an environment that camouflages the animal. Designs (without teacher support) an environment that camouflages the animal. Designs (without teacher support) an environment that camouflages the animal in more than one way.
    Design of physical adaptations Designs one or two physical adaptations. Designs three physical adaptations. Designs and explains three physical adaptations. Designs and explains more than three physical adaptations.
    Explanation of behavioral adaptations Explains a behavioral adaptation. Develops a behavioral adaptation. Develops and explains one behavioral adaptation. Compares behavioral adaptation to real animals.
    Effectiveness of oral presentation Gives an oral presentation with teacher support. Gives a two-minute oral presentation with organized information and teacher support. Gives a two-minute oral presentation with organized information. Gives a two-minute oral presentation with eye contact, appropriate volume, good posture, and organized information.


    Middle School

    Benchmark
    Describe how scientific theory traces possible evolutionary relationships among present and past life forms (SCI.III.4.MS.1).

    Benchmark Clarification
    Remains of organisms and fossils are found in rock layers or uncovered by excavation or erosion. From this physical evidence, scientists have constructed the geologic time scale. By studying remains, examining physiological structures, or conducting chemical tests (carbon dating) and genetic analysis, scientists can infer the relationship between present and past life forms.

    Evolutionary trees or diagrams, similarities in bone structure, or embryos of vertebrates may represent common ancestry. Present species may be modified descendants of more primitive ancestors.

    Students will:

    • Compare and contrast present-day living things and ancient life forms
    • Demonstrate the concept of common ancestry

    Key Concepts
    Selected evidence of common ancestry: